IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2016i6p96-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Мезонинное Финансирование: Особенности И Инструменты // The Public Mezzanine Capital: Feasibility Study

Author

Listed:
  • E. Stepanova O.

    (National Research Institute “Higher School of Economics”)

  • Е. Степанова О.

    (Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»)

Abstract

A growing number of financial institutions are unable to raise the required amount of equity and have to raise their own funds by means of public mezzanine. If these problems continue, the role of hybrids may become more significant, as they may be considered as a replacement of common equity for the purpose of counter-cyclical buffers, capital surcharges and so on. Thus, the importance of mezzanine capital for the financial system is already established and has a potential for further growth, while regulatory aspects and risk assessment of these relatively new instruments remain unsolved. In the article, the author analyses key regulatory concerns of Basel Accords in regards to mezzanine instruments, assesses the methodology of rating agencies to evaluate the risks incorporated in hybrid securities and compares the risk profiles of traditional convertible and recently developed contingent convertible bonds. The results articulate that measures applied by both Basel Committee members and rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s, etc.) are not sufficient to manage risks incorporated in hybrid securities. The latter may contribute to the growth of financial failures we have observed in recent years. Растущее число финансовых учреждений, не способных привлечь необходимое количество акционерного капитала, вынуждены привлекать средства через инструменты мезонинного финансирования. Если данные трудности продолжатся, то роль гибридных ценных бумаг может стать более существенной, так как их можно будет рассматривать в качестве замены обычным акциям в целях контрциклического буфера капитала, удовлетворению дополнительных требований увеличения капитала и т.д. Таким образом, важность мезонинного финансирования как для банковского сектора, так и прочих отраслей экономики очевидна и имеет потенциал для дальнейшего роста, однако нормативные аспекты и риски новых инструментов остаются до конца не исследованными. С этим связан интерес к такому методу финансирования участников российского финансового рынка, а задача обеспечения приемлемости уровня риска, передаваемого инвестору при структурировании мезонинного финансирования, в условиях кризиса приобретает особую остроту. В статье автор анализирует ключевые аспекты Базельских соглашений в отношении регулирования инструментов мезонинного финансирования, методологию рейтинговых агентств по оценке гибридных ценных бумаг и изучает влияние механизма конвертации на уровень риска гибридных ценных бумаг.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Stepanova O. & Е. Степанова О., 2016. "Мезонинное Финансирование: Особенности И Инструменты // The Public Mezzanine Capital: Feasibility Study," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 20(6), pages 96-107.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2016:i:6:p:96-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/310/237.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John D. Finnerty & Jeffrey Turner & Jack Chen & Rachael W. Park, 2011. "Regulatory Uncertainty and Financial Contagion: Evidence from the Hybrid Capital Securities Market," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 46(1), pages 1-42, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2016:i:6:p:96-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.