IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/econom/y2018i4p152-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Влияние ПИИ на формирование и реализацию стратегических региональных приоритетов развития // The impact of FDI on setting and implementation of strategic priorities for regional development

Author

Listed:
  • A. Tedeyeva V.

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow)

  • А. Тедеева В.

    (МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова, Москва)

Abstract

The subject of study is foreign direct investment (FDI) being a source for attracting both financial resources to implement investment projects in certain regions and improved production technologies, quality management systems, established sales markets, etc. The purpose of the work is to estimate the relationship between the growth in intensity of FDI inflows into the region’s economy and the increased potential for implementation of regional strategic development priorities. Thus, the growth in dynamics of accumulated foreign direct investment in the region may serve as an indicator of efficient economic strategy aimed at increased investment attractiveness, improved technologies, and broader integration into international economic relations. The article notes that FDI influences setting of strategic priorities designed to achieve desired results. The paper concludes that regions seeking to increase foreign investors’ activity should develop strategic documents that stipulate priorities and ensure the coherence of interests and values between foreign investors and regional business entities. Results: the article presents an analysis of dynamics in FDI inflows into the economy of Russian regions, their sources and sectoral allocation structure. Conclusions are drawn about the FDI effectiveness for financing strategic projects in various regions of the country. Also, the study identifies regions that consistently implement the set priorities and successfully attract FDI to develop manufacturing enterprises. Предмет исследования — прямые иностранные инвестиции (ПИИ), являющиеся источником привлечения как финансовых ресурсов для реализации инвестиционных проектов в отдельных регионах, так и более совершенных производственных технологий, качественных систем управления, налаженных рынков сбыта и пр. Цель работы — выявление наличия зависимости между ростом интенсивности притока ПИИ в экономику региона и повышением потенциала реализации региональных стратегических приоритетов развития. В статье отмечается, что под влиянием ПИИ происходит формирование стратегических приоритетов, направленных именно на достижение подобных результатов. В работе сделан вывод о том, что регионы, стремящиеся к увеличению инвестиционной активности со стороны иностранных корпораций, должны формировать стратегические документы, определяющие приоритеты, обеспечивающие согласованность интересов и ценностей иностранных инвесторов и региональных экономических субъектов. Результаты: в статье представлен анализ динамики поступления ПИИ в экономику регионов России, источники их происхождения и отраслевая структура распределения. Сделаны выводы об эффективности применения этого способа инвестирования стратегических проектов в различных регионах страны, выделены регионы, последовательно реализующие приоритеты привлечения ПИИ для развития предприятий обрабатывающей промышленности.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Tedeyeva V. & А. Тедеева В., 2018. "Влияние ПИИ на формирование и реализацию стратегических региональных приоритетов развития // The impact of FDI on setting and implementation of strategic priorities for regional development," Экономика. Налоги. Право // Economics, taxes & law, ФГОБУ "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 11(4), pages 152-160.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2018:i:4:p:152-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economy.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/443/426.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hosseini, Hamid, 2005. "An economic theory of FDI: A behavioral economics and historical approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 528-541, August.
    2. Borensztein, E. & De Gregorio, J. & Lee, J-W., 1998. "How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?1," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 115-135, June.
    3. Djankov, Simeon & Hoekman, Bernard M, 2000. "Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 14(1), pages 49-64, January.
    4. Hoekman, Bernard & Djankov, Simeon, 1996. "Intra-industry trade, foreign direct investment, and the reorientation of Eastern European exports," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1652, The World Bank.
    5. Djankov, Simeon & Hoekman, Bernard, 1996. "Intra-Industry Trade, Foreign Direct Investment and the Reorientation of East European Exports," CEPR Discussion Papers 1377, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanta Marwah & Akbar Tavakoli, 2004. "The Effect of Foreign Capital and Imports on Economic Growth: Further Evidence from Four Asian Countries," Carleton Economic Papers 04-02, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    2. Brahmbhatt, Milan & Srinivasan, T.G. & Murrell, Kim, 1996. "India in the global economy," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1681, The World Bank.
    3. Hui Wang & Huifang Liu, 2017. "An Empirical Research of FDI Spillovers and Financial Development Threshold Effects in Different Regions of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Nenad Stanisic, 2008. "Do Foreign Direct Investments Increase the Economic Growth of Southeastern European Transition Economies?," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 6(1), pages 29-38.
    5. Jin, Shaosheng & Guo, Haiyue & Delgado, Michael S. & Wang, H. Holly, 2017. "Benefit or damage? The productivity effects of FDI in the Chinese food industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Stoyan Totev & Grigor Sariiski, 2009. "Delocalisation Process and Changes of Competitive Advantages – A Survey of Enterprises," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 46-57.
    7. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/10184 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Thierry Mayer, 2006. "Policy Coherence for Development: A Background Paper on Foreign Direct Investment," OECD Development Centre Working Papers 253, OECD Publishing.
    9. Piotr Ciżkowicz & Magda Ciżkowicz-Pękała & Piotr Pękała & Andrzej Rzońca, 2017. "The effects of special economic zones on employment and investment: a spatial panel modeling perspective," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 571-605.
    10. Kose,Ayhan & Ohnsorge,Franziska Lieselotte & Ye,Lei Sandy & Islamaj,Ergys, 2017. "Weakness in investment growth : causes, implications and policy responses," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7990, The World Bank.
    11. Sule Ozler & Erol Taymaz, 2004. "Does foreign ownership matter for survival and growth? Dynamics of competition and foreign direct investment," ERC Working Papers 0406, ERC - Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Mar 2004.
    12. Valentin Goev & Vesselin Mintchev & Tsvetomira Tsenova-Knudsen & Venelin Boshnakov, 2002. "Determinants of European Union Enterprises Relocation in Bulgaria," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 7, pages 56-72.
    13. Li, Shenxue & Clark, Timothy & Sillince, John, 2018. "Constructing a strategy on the creation of core competencies for African companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 204-213.
    14. Martin Bijsterbosch & Marcin Kolasa, 2010. "FDI and productivity convergence in Central and Eastern Europe: an industry-level investigation," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 689-712, January.
    15. Gorodnichenko, Yuriy & Svejnar, Jan & Terrell, Katherine, 2014. "When does FDI have positive spillovers? Evidence from 17 transition market economies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 954-969.
    16. J. Caetano & A. Galego & E. Vaz & C. Vieira & I. Vieira, 2002. "The Eastward Enlargement of the Eurozone: Trade and FDI," Eastward Enlargement of the Euro-zone Working Papers wp07, Free University Berlin, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence, revised 01 Aug 2002.
    17. Lu, Qian & Zhao, Yunhui, 2010. "Spillover Effects of FDI in China: From the Perspective of Technology Gaps," MPRA Paper 81084, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Luka, Oksana & Levkovych, Inna, 2004. "Intra-industry trade in agricultural and food products: the case of Ukraine," IAMO Discussion Papers 78, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    19. Assaf Razin & Efraim Sadka, 2004. "Transparency, Specialization and FDI (new title: Corporate Transparency, Cream-Skimming and FDI)," CESifo Working Paper Series 1161, CESifo.
    20. repec:cnb:ocpubv:as16 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Tito Boeri & Joaquim Oliveira-Martins, 2002. "Transition, variété des produits et intégration économique," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 152(1), pages 55-69.
    22. Lim, King Yoong, 2019. "Industrial Transformation With Heterogeneous Labor And Foreign Experts," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(8), pages 3225-3266, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2018:i:4:p:152-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economy.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.