IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/accntn/y2019i4p42-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Интеграция методов управленческого учета в системе функционального учета затрат // The Integration of Management Accounting Techniques in the Functional-based Costing System

Author

Listed:
  • A. Panakhov U.

    (LTD “IT-Center”)

  • E. Babkova G.

    (Humanities and pedagogic Academy (branch) of Crimean Federal University by V. I. Vernadsky)

  • А. Панахов У.

    (ООО «IT-Центр»)

  • Э. Бабкова Г.

    (Гуманитарно-педагогическая академия (филиал) Крымский федеральный университет имени В. И. Вернадского)

Abstract

With the methodological development of cost accounting, there is a transition from the spatial plane of cost grouping, which has traditionally been considered as a “functional” one, to the process evaluation. At the same time, the development of the concept of Functional-Based Costing is making a transition today from grouping costs based on structural units of an enterprise to an integral system of cost accounting methods, based on generalized functional areas of economic processes (such as automation, HR, transport logistics, R&D, compliance etc.). In the economy of an enterprise, they include a much wider range of processes rather than just the work of a specialized structural unit of that enterprise. In contrast to the previously developed costing techniques, which predominantly consisted of the new methods of cost analysis, Functional-Based Costing is not an alternative direction in management accounting methodology but is a synthetic framework that allows to integrate the results of other costing approaches that are already known and researched to date. At the same time, the functional unity of processes and resources allows us to consider the development of the approach both in the context of further dissemination of Resource Consumption Accounting as well as in the context of the development of Life Cycle Costing. С развитием методов учета затрат происходит постепенный переход от пространственной плоскости их группировки, которую ранее рассматривали как «функциональную», к процессному измерению. При этом концепция функционального учета сегодня проходит путь от распределения затрат по структурным подразделениям (каждое из которых действительно специализируется на отдельной функции) до обобщенной системы методов учета затрат по универсальным функциональным областям экономики (таким, как автоматизация, управление персоналом, транспортная логистика, инновации, комплаенс), которые на уровне предприятия включают значительно более широкий спектр процессов, нежели только процессы работы профильного для них структурного подразделения. В отличие от ранее предлагавшихся методов управленческого учета, которые преимущественно представляли собой новые методы анализа затрат, функциональный учет не является альтернативным направлением в управленческом учете, а выступает синтетическим фреймворком, который позволяет интегрировать результаты других, ранее изученных методов. При этом функциональное единство процессов и ресурсов позволяет рассматривать развитие функционального подхода как в контексте дальнейшего развития Resource Consumption Accounting, так и в контексте развития Life Cycle Costing.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Panakhov U. & E. Babkova G. & А. Панахов У. & Э. Бабкова Г., 2019. "Интеграция методов управленческого учета в системе функционального учета затрат // The Integration of Management Accounting Techniques in the Functional-based Costing System," Учет. Анализ. Аудит // Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, ФГОБУВО "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 6(4), pages 42-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2019:i:4:p:42-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://accounting.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/269/262.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xi Chen & Bertrand M. Koebel, 2017. "Fixed Cost, Variable Cost, Markups and Returns to Scale," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 127, pages 61-94.
    2. Charles, Shannon L. & Hansen, Don R., 2008. "An evaluation of activity-based costing and functional-based costing: A game-theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 282-296, May.
    3. Charles, Shannon L. & Hansen, Don R., 2008. "An evaluation of activity-based costing and functional-based costing: A game-theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 480-494, May.
    4. Manfred Lenzen & Sven Lundie, 2012. "Constructing enterprise input-output tables - a case study of New Zealand dairy products," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 1(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Stead, H., 1976. "The costs of technological innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 2-9, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. Homburg & Julia Nasev & Philipp Plank, 2018. "The impact of cost allocation errors on price and product-mix decisions," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 497-527, August.
    2. Askarany, Davood & Yazdifar, Hassan, 2012. "An investigation into the mixed reported adoption rates for ABC: Evidence from Australia, New Zealand and the UK," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 430-439.
    3. Askarany, Davood & Yazdifar, Hassan & Askary, Saeed, 2010. "Supply chain management, activity-based costing and organisational factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 238-248, October.
    4. Mohebbi, Shima & Li, Xueping, 2015. "Coalitional game theory approach to modeling suppliers' collaboration in supply networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 333-342.
    5. Baykasoglu, Adil & Kaplanoglu, Vahit, 2008. "Application of activity-based costing to a land transportation company: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 308-324, December.
    6. Hennet, Jean-Claude & Mahjoub, Sonia, 2010. "Toward the fair sharing of profit in a supply network formation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 112-120, September.
    7. Tsai, Wen-Hsien & Lai, Chien-Wen & Tseng, Li-Jung & Chou, Wen-Chin, 2008. "Embedding management discretionary power into an ABC model for a joint products mix decision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 210-220, September.
    8. Sushil & Kamala Kannan Dinesh, 2022. "Structured Literature Review with TISM Leading to an Argumentation Based Conceptual Model," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(3), pages 387-407, September.
    9. Baldwin, John R. Beckstead, Desmond Gellatly, Guy, 2005. "Canada's Investments in Science and Innovation: Is the Existing Concept of Research and Development Sufficient?," Economic Analysis (EA) Research Paper Series 2005032e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    10. Sterlacchini, Alessandro, 1999. "Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 819-832, November.
    11. Ryosuke Shimizu & Shohei Momoda, 2021. "Does Automation Technology increase Wage?," Discussion papers ron343, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan.
    12. Soares, N. & Martins, A.G. & Carvalho, A.L. & Caldeira, C. & Du, C. & Castanheira, É. & Rodrigues, E. & Oliveira, G. & Pereira, G.I. & Bastos, J. & Ferreira, J.P. & Ribeiro, L.A. & Figueiredo, N.C. & , 2018. "The challenging paradigm of interrelated energy systems towards a more sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 171-193.
    13. Ekaterina Ponomareva & Alexandra Bozhechkova & Alexandr Knobel, 2012. "Factors of Economic Growth," Published Papers 172, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2013.
    14. Hanspeter Wieland & Manfred Lenzen & Arne Geschke & Jacob Fry & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Nina Eisenmenger & Johannes Schenk & Stefan Giljum, 2022. "The PIOLab: Building global physical input–output tables in a virtual laboratory," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 683-703, June.
    15. Ryosuke Shimizu & Shohei Momoda, 2020. "Does Automation Technology increase Wage?," KIER Working Papers 1039, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    16. Giovanni Cerulli & Bianca Poti', 2008. "Evaluating the Effect of Public Subsidies on firm R&D activity: an Application to Italy Using the Community Innovation Survey," CERIS Working Paper 200809, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2019:i:4:p:42-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://accounting.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.