IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/accntn/y2018i1p88-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Предпосылки конвергенции национальных учетных систем России и Китая // The Preconditions for the Convergence of the National Accounting Systems of Russia and China

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Lymar’ Pavlovna

    (Financial University)

  • Марина Лымарь Павловна

    (Финансовый университет)

Abstract

Subject. The subject of this paper are the main prerequisites for the harmonization of Russian and Chinese national accounting systems, as well as the main difficulties of convergence based on IFRS. Purpose. The purpose of the article is theoretical and practical justification of the possibility of convergence of Russian and Chinese accounting systems by considering the basic prerequisites for their independent development, as well as an analysis of the problems of transition of the two systems to IFRS standards. Methodology. The systematization of information about the studied objects was carried out by comparing the features of the historical, economic, national and ethical development of the two countries, by appealing to the analysts of Russian and Chinese authors, as well as the practice of drawing up financial statements by Russian-Chinese joint ventures. Results. As a result of the analysis, the main historical and normative prerequisites for convergence of the accounting systems of the two countries have been singled out, the main difficulties in comparing accounting practices and mechanisms for drawing up and presenting financial statements have been disclosed, and recommendations have been made for their elimination. The path of “club convergence” is proposed, which takes into account the historical, ethical and mental features of the national accounting systems of Russia and China. Conclusions. As the study showed, at present there are various prerequisites for the development of the concept of regional accounting convergence between Russia and China and other countries, in order to form a methodological apparatus for comparing the main elements of reporting of joint Russian-Chinese firms, for the successful implementation of joint investment projects in the energy sector, the military industrial complex, construction of large-scale infrastructure facilities, as well as strengthening trade cooperation. The conclusions and recommendations made by the author can be used in the training programs of the Russian-Chinese export center. Предмет. Данная работа посвящена рассмотрению основных предпосылок гармонизации российской и китайской национальных учетных систем, а также проблемных вопросов их сближения на основе Международных стандартов финансовой отчетности (МСФО). Цель. Цель исследования - теоретическое и практическое обоснование возможности сближения российской и китайской учетных систем путем отражения основных предпосылок их самостоятельного становления и развития, а также анализа проблем перехода двух систем на МСФО. Методология. Систематизация сведений об изучаемых объектах проводилась с помощью сравнения особенностей исторического, экономического, национально-этического развития двух стран, посредством обращения к аналитике российских и китайских авторов, а также практике составления финансовой отчетности российско-китайскими совместными предприятиями. Результаты. В результате проведенного анализа выделены основные исторические, нормативные предпосылки сближения учетных систем двух стран, также раскрыты основные сложности сопоставления учетных практик и механизмов составления и представления бухгалтерской отчетности, даны рекомендации по их устранению. Предложен путь «клубной конвергенции», который учитывает исторические, этические и ментальные особенности национальных учетных систем России и Китая. Выводы. Как показало проведенное исследование, в настоящее время существуют различного рода предпосылки для разработки концепции регионального сближения учетных систем России, Китая и других стран, для формирования методологического аппарата сопоставления основных элементов отчетности совместных российско-китайских фирм, для успешной реализации совместных инвестиционных проектов в энергетике, военно-промышленном комплексе, строительстве масштабных объектов инфраструктуры, а также для укрепления торгового сотрудничества. Сделанные автором заключения и рекомендации могут использоваться в обучающих программах российско-китайского экспортного центра.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Lymar’ Pavlovna & Марина Лымарь Павловна, 2018. "Предпосылки конвергенции национальных учетных систем России и Китая // The Preconditions for the Convergence of the National Accounting Systems of Russia and China," Учет. Анализ. Аудит // Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, ФГОБУВО "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 5(1), pages 88-97.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2018:i:1:p:88-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://accounting.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/223/224.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Gao & Morrison Handley-Schachler, 2003. "The influences of Confucianism, Feng Shui and Buddhism in Chinese accounting history," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 41-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jenny Jing Wang & Corinne Cortese, 2021. "Tracing dual entry beyond the Eurocentric boundary," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5051-5071, December.
    2. Silvia Rossetti & Roberto Verona, 2017. "International Differences in IFRS Policy Choice and the Persistence of Accounting Classification: The Case of China," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    3. George Lan & Zhenzhong Ma & JianAn Cao & He Zhang, 2009. "A Comparison of Personal Values of Chinese Accounting Practitioners and Students," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 59-76, April.
    4. Wang, Kewen & Li, Jingqiang & Qiao, Yuanbo & Chang, Shilong, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility Feng Shui and firm value," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Woo, Chi-Keung & Horowitz, Ira & Luk, Stephen & Lai, Aaron, 2008. "Willingness to pay and nuanced cultural cues: Evidence from Hong Kong's license-plate auction market," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 35-53, February.
    6. Hoskin, Keith & Macve, Richard, 2012. "Contesting the indigenous development of “Chinese double-entry bookkeeping” and its significance in China’s economic institutions and business organization before c.1850," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42583, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Malcolm Anderson, 2004. "Accounting history publications 2003," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 209-215.
    8. Roberta Provasi, 2013. "L?evoluzione contabile in Cina. Origini e confronti con il metodo partiduplistico italiano," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 91-115.
    9. Robert Bloom & John Solotko, 2003. "The foundation of Confucianism in Chinese and Japanese accounting," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 27-40.
    10. Göthlich, Stephan E., 2007. "Zur Ideengeschichte von Buchführung, Kostenrechung und Controlling vor dem Hintergrund ihres historischen Kontexts," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 617, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2018:i:1:p:88-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://accounting.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.