IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/00rbes/y2016i1p68-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

При Каких Условиях Политика Импортозамещения Может Стимулировать Реиндустриализацию // Under Which Conditions Can An Import Substitution Policy Be A Driver For Re-Industrialisation?

Author

Listed:
  • J. Truel

    (Université Paris Est Créteil)

  • Y. Pashchenko

    (Université Paris Est Creteil)

  • Ж. Трюэль

    (Университет Париж Критье)

  • Я. Пащенко

    (Университет Париж Критье)

Abstract

This paper examines various mechanisms of import substitution policies that can be implanted in Russia, with specific examples in the areas of agro-industry and high technology. It statesthe condition, under which these policies can help to pursue a strategy of re-industrialisation, and what some potential pitfalls are. Specific attention is being paid to the importance of vertical linkage effects, to relations between science, education and industry and to the role of favourable financial environment, especially in the field of innovation. As concerns the tools of import-substitution and their efficiency it would be stressed that to realize import-substitution policy it may be used a varietyof mechanisms: customs tariff (fee) and non-tariff (quotas, import licensing) regulations, as well as subsidies for domestic production and other tools of financial and non-financial state support. They do not have the same efficiency in terms of industrial policy. Авторы статьи оценивают различные механизмы политики импортозамещения, которые можно применить в России. Приведены отдельные примеры в области применения этих механизмов в АПК и в сфере высоких технологий. В статье указаны условия, при которых такие механизмы могут помочь осуществить стратегию реиндустриализации, показано также какие здесь кроются подводные камни. Особое внимание уделено важности эффектов вертикальных связей, взаимоотношениям между наукой, системой образования и промышленностью, а также роли соответствующего финансового обеспечения, особенно в сфере инноваций. Что касается средств импортозамещения и их эффективности, то в статье рекомендуется применять следующие механизмы: тарифные и нетарифные ограничения, субсидии и другие финансовыеи нефинансовые средства государственной поддержки отечественных производителей.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Truel & Y. Pashchenko & Ж. Трюэль & Я. Пащенко, 2016. "При Каких Условиях Политика Импортозамещения Может Стимулировать Реиндустриализацию // Under Which Conditions Can An Import Substitution Policy Be A Driver For Re-Industrialisation?," Review of Business and Economics Studies // Review of Business and Economics Studies, Финансовый Университет // Financial University, vol. 4(1), pages 68-74.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:00rbes:y:2016:i:1:p:68-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rbes.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/33/33.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Dosi, 1984. "Technical Change and Industrial Transformation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-17521-5, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heijs, Joost, 2003. "Freerider behaviour and the public finance of R&D activities in enterprises: the case of the Spanish low interest credits for R&D," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 445-461, March.
    2. Gilberto Tadeu Lima, 2000. "Market concentration and technological innovation in a dynamic model of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 447-475.
    3. Mario Cimoli, 2002. "Networks, Market Structures and Economic Shocks: The structural changes of Innovation Systems in Latin America," LEM Papers Series 2002/13, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    4. repec:dgr:rugsom:97b05 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Chen, Cheng-Fen & Sewell, Graham, 1996. "Strategies for technological development in South Korea and Taiwan: the case of semiconductors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 759-783, August.
    6. Michael S. Dahl & Christian Ø.R. Pedersen & Bent Dalum, 2003. "Entry by Spinoff in a High-tech Cluster," DRUID Working Papers 03-11, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    7. Michael S. Dahl & Christian Ø.R. Pedersen & Bent Dalum, 2005. "Entrepreneurial Founder Effects in the Growth of Regional Clusters How Early Success is a Key Determinant," DRUID Working Papers 05-18, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    8. Chad M. Baum, 2013. "Mass-Produced Food: the Rise and Fall of the Promise of Health and Safety," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2013-03, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    9. Anne Épaulard & Jean-Pierre Laffargue & Pierre Malgrange, 2008. "Présentation générale," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(2), pages 1-13.
    10. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Lleo, María & Cervello, Roberto, 2017. "The dynamics of cluster entrepreneurship: Knowledge legacy from parents or agglomeration effects? The case of the Castellon ceramic tile district," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 73-92.
    11. Giovanni Dosi & Richard Nelson, 2013. "The Evolution of Technologies: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 3(1), pages 3-46, June.
    12. Mario Cimoli & Giovanni Dosi & Richard Nelson & Joseph Stiglitz, 2007. "Policies and Institutional Engineering in Developing Economies," Globelics Working Paper Series 2007-04, Globelics - Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems, Aalborg University, Department of Business and Management.
    13. Coronese, Matteo & Occelli, Martina & Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "AgriLOVE: Agriculture, land-use and technical change in an evolutionary, agent-based model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    14. Blandine Laperche, 2001. "Potentiel d'innovation des grandes entreprises et État, argumentation évolutionniste sur l'appropriation des informations scientifiques et techniques," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 13(1), pages 61-85.
    15. Marc Humbert, 1989. "Les régulations sociales face au système industriel mondial," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 30(120), pages 823-846.
    16. Castillo, Mario & Rovira, Sebastián & Gligo S., Nicolo, 2017. "La política industrial 4.0 en América Latina," Documentos de Proyectos 43944, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    17. Jorge Nogueira de Paiva Britto & Leonardo Costa Ribeiro & Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque, 2021. "Global systems of innovation: introductory notes on a new layer and a new hierarchy in innovation systems," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2-3), pages 259-279, September.
    18. E. Conesa, 1998. "Organizational Dynamics and the Evolutionary Dilemma between Diversity and Standardization in Mission-Oriented Research Programmes: An Illustration," Working Papers ir98023, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    19. Sydow, Jörg & Müller-Seitz, Gordon, 2020. "Open innovation at the interorganizational network level – Stretching practices to face technological discontinuities in the semiconductor industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Carolina Castaldi & Giovanni Dosi, 2003. "The Grip of History and the Scope for Novelty: Some Results and Open Questions on Path Dependence in Economic Processes," LEM Papers Series 2003/02, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    21. Hiro Izushi & Yuko Aoyama, 2006. "Industry Evolution and Cross-Sectoral Skill Transfers: A Comparative Analysis of the Video Game Industry in Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(10), pages 1843-1861, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:00rbes:y:2016:i:1:p:68-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rbes.fa.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.