IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/usvaep/v16y2016i1(23)p123-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value Of Ecologic Component In Forest Management Decision Making. Case Study: Forests Adjacent To Bucharest, Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina RADULESCU

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Maria Loredana POPESCU

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Amelia DIACONU

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

To say environment management is, nowadays, of outmost importance for any ecosystem concerned in an understatement; nevertheless, in Romania, especially – as least, since the present paper analyses Romanian ecologic statu quo – improving forest management, so to speak, in Romania, is all the more important, since social and economic decisionmaking as to forests (e.g. forests close to Romania’s capital, Bucharest) includes necessarily an ecologic component. The main issue is how to make this component as visible and important as posible, without simultaneously reducing the economic and social components.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina RADULESCU & Maria Loredana POPESCU & Amelia DIACONU, 2016. "Value Of Ecologic Component In Forest Management Decision Making. Case Study: Forests Adjacent To Bucharest, Romania," The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 16(1(23)), pages 123-128, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:16:y:2016:i:1(23):p:123-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/USVAEPA_VOL.16,ISSUE_1(23),2016_fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:16:y:2016:i:1(23):p:123-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.