IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/usvaep/v15y2015i1(21)p204-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Territorial Profile Of Public Expenditures At Lau 2 Level, For 2007-2013 Period In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina LINCARU

    (National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection -INCSMPS, Romania)

  • Speranta PIRCIOG

    (National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection -INCSMPS, Romania)

  • Vasilica CIUCÃ

    (National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection -INCSMPS, Romania)

  • Draga ATANASIU

    (National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection -INCSMPS, Romania)

  • Beatrice CHIRIAC

    (National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection -INCSMPS, Romania)

Abstract

In view to improve the use of Cohesion policy resources more effectively and efficiently, we propose to explore the achievements of Structural and Cohesion Funds in 2007-13 in Romania at NUTS 5 /LAU 2 level in rural and urban areas. The common reformed cohesion policy represented by the EU Regulation 1303/2013 proposes the integrated approach of territorial development. On this background the territorial unit of analysis is the local administrative unit as the smallest regional hub for integrated public policies, including cohesion policy as well. This analysis involves administrative data provided by MDRP – Regional Development and Public Administration Ministry, connected with socio-economic indicators provided by INS TEMPO. The budgetary capacity of the LAU2 is evaluated using the spatial analysis applications according Anselin (2005, 2006 - using ARC GIS and GEODA software) for period 2007-2013. The main result of this article is the territorial heterogenic profile of public expenditures at LAU 2 level with focus on expenditures on projects funded by external grants (irredeemable), useful input for regional policy efficient targeting, especially on the background of the Jobs – Growth - Investment Plan’s New EU Initiative. Looking at the big picture it is visible the higher the spatial heterogeneity tendency in terms of socio economic indicators than the terms of local budget indicators, when is applied the LISA clusters analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina LINCARU & Speranta PIRCIOG & Vasilica CIUCÃ & Draga ATANASIU & Beatrice CHIRIAC, 2015. "A Territorial Profile Of Public Expenditures At Lau 2 Level, For 2007-2013 Period In Romania," The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 15(1(21)), pages 2014-2213, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:15:y:2015:i:1(21):p:204-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/USVAEPA_VOL.15,ISSUE_1%2821%29,2015_fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristina LINCARU & Vasilica CIUCĂ & Speranța PIRCIOG & Draga ATANASIU & Beatrice CHIRIAC, 2015. "SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS IN LOCATIONS BY CLUSTERS IDENTIFIED FOR REGISTERED UNEMPLOYED PERSONS AT LAU2 /NUTS 5 LEVEL IN 2013 AND 2010 Abstract : Identifying locations that are part of the LAU2 two ty," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 4(Special I), pages 1-34, august.
    2. Daniela- Luminita CONSTANTIN, 2021. "Addressing Spatial Justice At Lower Territorial Levels. Some Insights From The Central And East European Countries' Perspective," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 315-326, June.
    3. Felix-Angel Popescu, 2018. "The Impact Of Structural And Cohesion Funds On The Economy Of Bihor County During 2007-2013 Programming Period," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3(special), pages 74-83, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:15:y:2015:i:1(21):p:204-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.