Author
Listed:
- Valentino TASCIONE
(DASTA - Department of Business, Statistical, Technological and Environmental Sciences "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy)
- Andrea RAGGI
(DASTA - Department of Business, Statistical, Technological and Environmental Sciences "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy)
Abstract
LCA is a decision support tool that evaluates the environmental impacts throughout the life cycle of a product or a process. This tool can also be used to assess the environmental performances of an integrated waste management system or to identify the one with the best performance through a comparative analysis of different scenarios. The result of the analysis depends primarily on how scenarios to compare are constructed, that depends on which fractions, and in what amounts, are sent to certain treatments/destinations. In the first part of the paper, we will introduce the concept of scenario, how it be can classified and how it can be built, as is clear from the literature. Then we will try to examine the criteria used in choosing the scenarios of waste management systems under the LCA, through a literature review. This critical review, which is the first phase of a larger study, highlights that arbitrary criteria are generally used in the selection of scenarios. In this way the best combination among all possible ones might not be considered; indeed, the best one among a discrete set of possibilities can just be identified. Furthermore, the paper highlights the advisability to identify an LCA-integrated tool that allows one to find the most environmentally-sound scenario among all those theoretically possible.
Suggested Citation
Valentino TASCIONE & Andrea RAGGI, 2011.
"A Review Of Approaches For Selecting Integrated Waste Management Scenarios For Life Cycle Assessment Studies,"
The Annals of the "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 11(1(13)), pages 129-140, June.
Handle:
RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:11:y:2011:i:1(13):p:129-140
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:11:y:2011:i:1(13):p:129-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.