IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/ausvfe/v10y2010ispecialp389-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doctrinary Opinions Regarding The Autonomy Of Communities In The Local Public Administration Management

Author

Listed:
  • Petronela ZAHARIA

    (Faculty of Economics and Public Administration,“Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania)

  • Irina BILOUSEAC

    (Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, “Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

Addressing the issues of delimitation and enhancement of local autonomy in the management of local cmmunities is an exciting and challenging endeavor, especially since this subject is very topical. This paper, built up on the investigation of recent publications in local government management, presents a unified position reflected in the field literature on the decisive role of the autonomy of communities in the management of local development. Furthermore, it should be considered that, in many of the studies under investigation, there is some consistency in the approach of the financial dimension of autonomy, without which there cannot be a successful self-management of local public affairs. This paper also points out that only under conditions ensuring a genuine local autonomy it is possible to meet the needs of local communities by providing quality public services.

Suggested Citation

  • Petronela ZAHARIA & Irina BILOUSEAC, 2010. "Doctrinary Opinions Regarding The Autonomy Of Communities In The Local Public Administration Management," The Annals of the "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 10(Special), pages 389-394, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:10:y:2010:i:special:p:389-394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/ANNALS%20vol.10,nr.special,2010%20fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:10:y:2010:i:special:p:389-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.