IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sch/journl/v10y2008i1p68-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Improved Water Quality in Rural Areas: An Exploratory Study in Coastal AP

Author

Listed:
  • V Ratna Reddy

    (Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad)

  • M Kullappa

    (State Co-ordinator, AP, Water and Sanitation Programme, South Asia (WSP-SA).)

  • D Mohan Rao

    (Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad)

Abstract

This study attempts to assess the costs and benefits of improved water quality in rural communities on the backdrop of a proposed water purification project in coastal districts of Andhra Pradesh. Important issues assessed include: i) Health sector benefits due to averted illness, ii) Patient expenses saved due to averted illness, and iii) Value of productive days gained due to averted illness. Both qualitative and quantitative information is being elicited from households in six villages in three districts. Group discussions, discussions with local doctors and Naandi Foundation were conducted to get an overview of the situation. Cost-benefit analysis has been carried out from the angle of social welfare rather than from a purely economic point of view. Besides, a willingness to pay survey was conducted to assess the ability of rural communities to pay. Important conclusions of the study include: i) All the sample tests for water quality and discussions with doctors confirm health and water quality linkages. ii) Households incur substantial losses due to ill health and the resultant loss of working days. Losses are more in terms of medical expenses followed by working days lost and expenditure on water. Such losses are relatively more among Below Poverty Line (BPL) households and also among women. iii) Households experience positive Social and Health benefits in the medium to long term. iv) Poor are paying disproportionately higher proportion of their income towards improved water supplies. Hence, discriminatory pricing or cross subsidisation could be a desirable option in order to reduce the burden on poor households. v) The viability of the technology is limited to large villages (above 500 households) eliminating the small and medium villages that are in majority. Appropriate institutional arrangements for managing the existing distribution systems appear to be a better option in these villages. The existing systems are also cost effective when compared with the proposed new technology.

Suggested Citation

  • V Ratna Reddy & M Kullappa & D Mohan Rao, 2008. "Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Improved Water Quality in Rural Areas: An Exploratory Study in Coastal AP," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, vol. 10(1), pages 68-97, January-J.
  • Handle: RePEc:sch:journl:v:10:y:2008:i:1:p:68-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.isec.ac.in/JSED_v10_i1_68-97.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. V. Ratna Reddy & M. S. Ramamohan Rao & M. Venkataswamy, 2010. "'Slippage' : The Bane of Rural Drinking Water Sector (A Study of Extent and Causes in Andhra Pradesh)," Microeconomics Working Papers 22734, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    2. Reddy, V. Ratna & Rout, Sanjit Kumar & Chiranjeevi, T. & Sharma, S.S.P., 2012. "Performance and Factors Influencing the Impact of Watershed Development Programme in Rajasthan," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(1), pages 1-23.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sch:journl:v:10:y:2008:i:1:p:68-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: B B Chand (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iseccin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.