IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v62y2025i4p647-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unequal access to childcare in cities: Is equal public funding sufficient?

Author

Listed:
  • Astrid Pennerstorfer

    (WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria)

  • Dieter Pennerstorfer

    (Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

  • Michaela Neumayr

    (WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria)

Abstract

This article examines inequalities in the spatial accessibility of childcare between high- and low-status neighbourhoods in the city of Vienna and asks (i) whether specific public and non-profit provider types contribute to these inequalities and (ii) which factors may cause these inequalities in a mainly tax-funded childcare system. For our analysis, we combine data on the location and characteristics of childcare providers with spatially granular information on demand and neighbourhood characteristics. The results show that two provider types – church-related and independent non-profit providers – are mainly responsible for the higher accessibility of childcare in neighbourhoods with higher socio-economic status. Specifically independent providers charge significantly higher prices and offer more special services in these high-status areas. Public funding of a large part of the production costs, therefore, seems insufficient to ensure equal access in all neighbourhoods. These findings suggest that the exclusive comparison between public, private non-profit and private for-profit providers often found in the literature may be too narrow.

Suggested Citation

  • Astrid Pennerstorfer & Dieter Pennerstorfer & Michaela Neumayr, 2025. "Unequal access to childcare in cities: Is equal public funding sufficient?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(4), pages 647-664, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:4:p:647-664
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980241258298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241258298
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980241258298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:4:p:647-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.