IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v62y2025i2p292-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communities built on political trust: Theory and evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zeng

    (Peking University, China)

  • Shitong Qiao

    (Duke University, USA)

Abstract

This study offers a unique mixed-methods investigation on the formation of neighbourhood communities in China’s megacities. We find that the local government helps homeowners overcome prevalent collective action problems and govern themselves more effectively. Neighbourhoods that have established homeowners’ associations (HOAs) enjoy better governing outcomes than those without HOAs, as evidenced by homeowners wielding greater control over neighbourhood affairs, showing heightened respect for democratic principles, and maintaining a stronger sense of community identity. Owing to these positive outcomes, and as compared to their counterparts in neighbourhoods without HOAs, homeowner activists in neighbourhoods with HOAs develop a deeper trust in their local government. As such, our argument that urban communities are based on political trust in authoritarian regimes complicates the conventional view that such regimes either repress civic engagement or manipulate civic organisations for social control.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zeng & Shitong Qiao, 2025. "Communities built on political trust: Theory and evidence from China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(2), pages 292-309, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:2:p:292-309
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980241252043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241252043
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980241252043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:2:p:292-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.