IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v61y2024i9p1703-1721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deconstructing the urban viewpoint: Exploring uneven regional development with Nancy Fraser’s notion of justice

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina Grange

    (Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden)

  • Nils Björling

    (Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden)

  • Lina Olsson

    (Malmö University, Sweden)

  • Julia Fredriksson

    (Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden)

Abstract

Uneven regional development fomented by city-centric growth agendas generates significant challenges for regional peripheries. Placing regional margins and other plural geographies at the centre, in this article we apply a normative framework based on justice theory to uncover the dominance of urban viewpoints in urban regional development policy. Departing from Nancy Fraser’s three-dimensional justice theory, we provide a deconstruction of city-centrism by illustrating how regional disparities in two regions in Sweden are not only reproduced by economic maldistribution but also by political misrepresentation and cultural misrecognition. By doing so, we illustrate the fruitfulness of applying a normative justice framework to create a broader understanding of factors that contribute to the political production of uneven regional development and need to be addressed if a transformative and progressive change is to occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina Grange & Nils Björling & Lina Olsson & Julia Fredriksson, 2024. "Deconstructing the urban viewpoint: Exploring uneven regional development with Nancy Fraser’s notion of justice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(9), pages 1703-1721, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:9:p:1703-1721
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980231214502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980231214502
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980231214502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Soja, 2015. "Accentuate The Regional," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 372-381, March.
    2. Ananya Roy, 2009. "The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 819-830.
    3. David Etherington & Martin Jones, 2009. "City-Regions: New Geographies of Uneven Development and Inequality," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 247-265.
    4. Hillary Angelo & David Wachsmuth, 2020. "Why does everyone think cities can save the planet?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(11), pages 2201-2221, August.
    5. Jamie Peck, 2020. "Cities beyond Compare?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 160-182, July.
    6. Andrew E.G. Jonas & Kevin Ward, 2007. "Introduction to a Debate on City‐Regions: New Geographies of Governance, Democracy and Social Reproduction," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 169-178, March.
    7. Joe Painter, 2013. "Regional Biopolitics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1235-1248, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Miguel Kanai, 2014. "Capital of the Amazon Rainforest: Constructing a Global City-region for Entrepreneurial Manaus," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2387-2405, August.
    2. Allen J. Scott, 2019. "City-regions reconsidered," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 554-580, May.
    3. Kevin Ward & Timothy Bunnell, 2021. "Reflections on five years of the Summer Institute in Urban Studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(4), pages 863-878, March.
    4. Ilaria Zambon & Artemi Cerdà & Filippo Gambella & Gianluca Egidi & Luca Salvati, 2019. "Industrial Sprawl and Residential Housing: Exploring the Interplay between Local Development and Land-Use Change in the Valencian Community, Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Roger Keil, 2011. "The Global City Comes Home," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2495-2517, September.
    6. Dan He & Zhijing Sun & Peng Gao, 2019. "Development of Economic Integration in the Central Yangtze River Megaregion from the Perspective of Urban Network Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Jouni Häkli & Kirsi Pauliina Kallio & Olli Ruokolainen, 2020. "A Missing Citizen? Issue Based Citizenship in City‐Regional Planning," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 876-893, September.
    8. Davide Luca & Javier Terrero-Davila & Jonas Stein & Neil Lee, 2023. "Progressive cities: Urban–rural polarisation of social values and economic development around the world," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(12), pages 2329-2350, September.
    9. Carolyn Cartier, 2017. "Contextual Urban Theory and the ‘Appeal’ of Gentrification: Lost in Transposition?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 466-477, May.
    10. Luca Salvati & Margherita Carlucci & Efstathios Grigoriadis & Francesco Maria Chelli, 2018. "Uneven dispersion or adaptive polycentrism? Urban expansion, population dynamics and employment growth in an ‘ordinary’ city," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 38(1), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Michael Buser, 2014. "Democratic Accountability and Metropolitan Governance: The Case of South Hampshire, UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2336-2353, August.
    12. Michael Storper & Allen J Scott, 2016. "Current debates in urban theory: A critical assessment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1114-1136, May.
    13. Liza Rose Cirolia & Suraya Scheba, 2019. "Towards a multi-scalar reading of informality in Delft, South Africa: Weaving the ‘everyday’ with wider structural tracings," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 594-611, February.
    14. Monstadt, Jochen & Meilinger, Valentin, 2020. "Governing Suburbia through regionalized land-use planning? Experiences from the Greater Frankfurt region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Michael Hoyler & John Harrison, 2017. "Global cities research and urban theory making," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(12), pages 2853-2858, December.
    16. Christian Schmid & Ozan Karaman & Naomi C Hanakata & Pascal Kallenberger & Anne Kockelkorn & Lindsay Sawyer & Monika Streule & Kit Ping Wong, 2018. "Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 19-52, January.
    17. Byron Miller & Kevin Ward & Ryan Burns & Victoria Fast & Anthony Levenda, 2021. "Worlding and provincialising smart cities: From individual case studies to a global comparative research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 655-673, February.
    18. J Miguel Kanai & Seth Schindler, 2019. "Peri-urban promises of connectivity: Linking project-led polycentrism to the infrastructure scramble," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(2), pages 302-322, March.
    19. Shenjing He & Junxi Qian, 2017. "From an emerging market to a multifaceted urban society: Urban China studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 827-846, March.
    20. Jennifer Robinson, 2022. "Introduction: Generating concepts of ‘the urban’ through comparative practice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(8), pages 1521-1535, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:9:p:1703-1721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.