IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v61y2024i16p3167-3186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Catalysts of connection. The role of digital information and communication technology in fostering neighbourhood social cohesion: A systematic review of empirical findings

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Ãœblacker

    (University of Applied Science for Housing and Real Estate, Germany)

  • Simon Liebig

    (ILS, Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development, Germany)

  • Hawzheen Hamad

    (University of Applied Science for Housing and Real Estate, Germany)

Abstract

Neighbourhood social cohesion is associated with a range of beneficial outcomes for residents. However, it is commonly hypothesised that neighbourhood relations face potential disruptions from digital information and communication technologies (DICT) as they are assumed to alter traditional community structures previously grounded in physical proximity. We systematically review 52 empirical studies on the relationship between DICT and neighbourhood social cohesion to determine in what ways DICT hinder or promote neighbourhood social cohesion. We found that DICT promote social cohesion by catalysing local social capital, but not for everyone and not in every neighbourhood. We propose the theoretical concept of ‘catalysts of connection’ to explain how technological affordances and online content interact with collective and individual social capital to develop various domains of social cohesion. Based on these results and our theoretical concept, we conclude that DICT exacerbate socio-spatial inequality in cities as neighbourhoods with low social capital are less likely to reap the benefits of the digital age. We provide paths for future investigations on the intersection of urban research and media and communication studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Ãœblacker & Simon Liebig & Hawzheen Hamad, 2024. "Catalysts of connection. The role of digital information and communication technology in fostering neighbourhood social cohesion: A systematic review of empirical findings," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:16:p:3167-3186
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980241281502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241281502
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980241281502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:16:p:3167-3186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.