IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v61y2024i12p2349-2369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Child-friendly urban practices as emergent place-based neoliberal subjectivation?

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Perez-del-Pulgar

    (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Germany; Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability, Spain)

  • Isabelle Anguelovski

    (Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, Spain; Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability, Spain; Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Spain)

  • James JT Connolly

    (University of British Columbia, Canada; Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability, Spain)

Abstract

As city-level decisionmakers generate urban policies and spatial interventions aimed at enhancing children’s environments and increasing their health, wellbeing and participation in urban life, they also impact the types of citizens that cities produce. Yet, despite the increasing ubiquity of city plans targeting the creation of child-friendly environments, child-centred transformations within the urban built fabric have not been a major analytical theme compared to other economic, spatial and welfare aspects of city restructuring in the context of neoliberal urbanisation. In light of this need for greater empirical and theoretical exploration of child-centred urbanism, we compare and contrast how plans reorganise children’s urban social space across different neoliberalising contexts. Drawing on empirical research conducted in Amsterdam, Vienna and Bristol in 2019, including 46 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders involved in child-friendly planning, we contribute to the understanding of how place-based subjectivation processes operate within these plans. We argue that child-friendly urban plans are instrumental in the process of creating subjects that have internalised the norms of neoliberal urbanisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Perez-del-Pulgar & Isabelle Anguelovski & James JT Connolly, 2024. "Child-friendly urban practices as emergent place-based neoliberal subjectivation?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(12), pages 2349-2369, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:12:p:2349-2369
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980241235781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241235781
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980241235781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth A Gagen, 2000. "An Example to Us All: Child Development and Identity Construction in Early 20th-Century Playgrounds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(4), pages 599-616, April.
    2. Peter Brand, 2007. "Green Subjection: The Politics of Neoliberal Urban Environmental Management," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 616-632, September.
    3. Lianne Verstrate & Lia Karsten, 2011. "The Creation of Play Spaces in Twentieth-century Amsterdam: From an Intervention of Civil Actors to a Public Policy," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 85-109, February.
    4. Marguerite Berg, 2013. "City Children and Genderfied Neighbourhoods: The New Generation as Urban Regeneration Strategy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 523-536, March.
    5. Todd L. Goodsell, 2013. "Familification: Family, Neighborhood Change, and Housing Policy," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 845-868, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marguerite van den Berg, 2018. "The discursive uses of Jane Jacobs for the genderfying city: Understanding the productions of space for post-Fordist gender notions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 751-766, March.
    2. Ida Andersson & Laura James, 2018. "Altruism or entrepreneurialism? The co-evolution of green place branding and policy tourism in Växjö, Sweden," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3437-3453, November.
    3. Zoé A Hamstead, 2024. "Thermal insecurity: Violence of heat and cold in the urban climate refuge," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 531-548, February.
    4. Alec Foster, 2021. "Volunteer Urban Environmental Stewardship, Emotional Economies of Care, and Productive Power in Philadelphia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Marit Rosol, 2013. "Vancouver’s “EcoDensity†Planning Initiative: A Struggle over Hegemony?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(11), pages 2238-2255, August.
    6. Clough, Sharyn, 2011. "Gender and the hygiene hypothesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 486-493, February.
    7. Sandra Huning & Nina Schuster, 2015. "‘Social Mixing' or ‘Gentrification'? Contradictory Perspectives on Urban Change in the Berlin District of Neukölln," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 738-755, July.
    8. Robert M Vanderbeck, 2008. "Inner-City Children, Country Summers: Narrating American Childhood and the Geographies of Whiteness," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(5), pages 1132-1150, May.
    9. Kersty Hobson, 2013. "‘Weak’ or ‘Strong’ Sustainable Consumption? Efficiency, Degrowth, and the 10 Year Framework of Programmes," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(6), pages 1082-1098, December.
    10. Janice Morphet, 2017. "Rescaling the suburban: New directions in the relationship between governance and infrastructure," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(8), pages 803-817, December.
    11. Joshua Long & Jennifer L Rice, 2019. "From sustainable urbanism to climate urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 992-1008, April.
    12. Märit Jansson & Emma Herbert & Alva Zalar & Maria Johansson, 2022. "Child-Friendly Environments—What, How and by Whom?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    13. Heike Hanhörster & Isabel Ramos Lobato & Sabine Weck, 2021. "People, Place, and Politics: Local Factors Shaping Middle‐Class Practices in Mixed‐Class German Neighbourhoods," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 363-374.
    14. Heike Hanhörster & Isabel Ramos Lobato & Sabine Weck, 2021. "People, Place, and Politics: Local Factors Shaping Middle‐Class Practices in Mixed‐Class German Neighbourhoods," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 363-374.
    15. Joshua Long, 2016. "Constructing the narrative of the sustainability fix: Sustainability, social justice and representation in Austin, TX," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(1), pages 149-172, January.
    16. David Gibbs & Rob Krueger & Gordon MacLeod, 2013. "Grappling with Smart City Politics in an Era of Market Triumphalism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(11), pages 2151-2157, August.
    17. Rosanna Salvia & Gianluca Egidi & Luca Salvati & Jesús Rodrigo-Comino & Giovanni Quaranta, 2020. "In-Between ‘Smart’ Urban Growth and ‘Sluggish’ Rural Development? Reframing Population Dynamics in Greece, 1940–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Alberto Vanolo, 2014. "Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(5), pages 883-898, April.
    19. Cousins, Joshua J., 2021. "Justice in nature-based solutions: Research and pathways," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    20. Sarah Mills, 2014. "Youth on Streets and Bob-a-Job Week: Urban Geographies of Masculinity, Risk, and Home in Postwar Britain," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(1), pages 112-128, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:12:p:2349-2369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.