IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v58y2021i8p1732-1744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who owns the future city? Phases of technological urbanism and shifts in sovereignty

Author

Listed:
  • Jathan Sadowski

Abstract

Smart urbanism has, over the last decade or so, grown to become a major research area within the social science of cities and digital technology. This critical commentary aims to outline a new framework for analysing the urban political economic dynamics currently unfolding through different combinations of power, technology and capital in cities. Rather than simply spreading via one static model of smart urbanism, the practices and purposes for rolling out digital technology in cities continue to evolve in important ways. I integrate the established research on smart urbanism with emerging work on ‘platform urbanism’, thus providing a coherent and forward-looking analysis of how various techno-political trends are connected yet distinct. In broad brushstrokes, over the last decade the urbanisation of technology capital has happened in concurrent phases, with each one seeking to take hold over a different aspect of the city: oversight of city governance, operation of city services and ownership of city space. I conclude by linking this political economic analysis to questions about fundamental shifts in urban sovereignty as technology companies move beyond treating the city merely as a place to extract value from and start thinking of it as also a space to exercise dominion over.

Suggested Citation

  • Jathan Sadowski, 2021. "Who owns the future city? Phases of technological urbanism and shifts in sovereignty," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1732-1744, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:8:p:1732-1744
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098020913427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098020913427
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098020913427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanyal, Romola & Ferreri, Mara, 2018. "Platform economies and urban planning: Airbnb and regulated deregulation in London," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87473, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Donald McNeill, 2017. "Start-ups and the entrepreneurial city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 232-239, March.
    3. Louis Moreno, 2014. "The urban process under financialised capitalism," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 244-268, June.
    4. Nicole Gurran & Peter Phibbs, 2017. "When Tourists Move In: How Should Urban Planners Respond to Airbnb?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 80-92, January.
    5. Ciepley, David, 2013. "Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(1), pages 139-158, February.
    6. Ezra Ho, 2017. "Smart subjects for a Smart Nation? Governing (smart)mentalities in Singapore," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(13), pages 3101-3118, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Shan Tseng & Christoph Becker & Ida Roikonen, 2024. "Dialectical approach to unpacking knowledge-making for digital urban democracy: A critical case of Helsinki-based e-participatory budgeting," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(1), pages 112-129, January.
    2. Mike Hodson & Andy Lockhart & Andrew McMeekin, 2024. "How have digital mobility platforms responded to COVID-19 and why does this matter for ‘the urban’?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(5), pages 923-942, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcus Hübscher & Till Kallert, 2023. "Taming Airbnb Locally: Analysing Regulations in Amsterdam, Berlin and London," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 114(1), pages 6-27, February.
    2. Chaang-Iuan Ho & Tzong-Shyuan Chen & Chin-Pei Li, 2023. "Airbnb’s Negative Externalities from the Consumer’s Perspective: How the Effects Influence the Booking Intention of Potential Guests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Shijie Sun & Shengyue Zhang & Xingjian Wang, 2021. "Characteristics and influencing factors of Airbnb spatial distribution in China’s rapid urbanization process: A case study of Nanjing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Manuel de la Calle-Vaquero & María García-Hernández & Sofía Mendoza de Miguel, 2020. "Urban Planning Regulations for Tourism in the Context of Overtourism. Applications in Historic Centres," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Agustin Cocola-Gant & Ana Gago, 2021. "Airbnb, buy-to-let investment and tourism-driven displacement: A case study in Lisbon," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(7), pages 1671-1688, October.
    6. Gurran, Nicole & Zhang, Yuting & Shrestha, Pranita, 2020. "‘Pop-up’ tourism or ‘invasion’? Airbnb in coastal Australia," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Helen X. H. Bao & Saul Shah, 2020. "The Impact of Home Sharing on Residential Real Estate Markets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Juan Luis Jiménez & Armando Ortuño & Jorge V. Pérez-Rodríguez, 2022. "How does AirBnb affect local Spanish tourism markets?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2515-2545, May.
    9. José María Martín Martín & José Antonio Rodriguez Martín & Karla Aída Zermeño Mejía & José Antonio Salinas Fernández, 2018. "Effects of Vacation Rental Websites on the Concentration of Tourists—Potential Environmental Impacts. An Application to the Balearic Islands in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Andrea Pollio, 2020. "Making the silicon cape of Africa: Tales, theories and the narration of startup urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(13), pages 2715-2732, October.
    11. Gianni Talamini & Ting Liu & Roula El-Khoury & Di Shao, 2023. "Visibility and symbolism of corporate architecture: A multi-method approach for visual impact assessment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(9), pages 2407-2429, November.
    12. Hui Li & Yijin Kim & Kannan Srinivasan, 2022. "Market Shifts in the Sharing Economy: The Impact of Airbnb on Housing Rentals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8015-8044, November.
    13. Irene Rubino & Cristina Coscia & Rocco Curto, 2020. "Identifying Spatial Relationships between Built Heritage Resources and Short-Term Rentals before the Covid-19 Pandemic: Exploratory Perspectives on Sustainability Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Maalsen, Sophia & Wolifson, Peta & Rogers, Dallas & Nelson, Jacqueline & Buckle, Caitlin, 2021. "Understanding discrimination effects in private rental housing," SocArXiv jdycg, Center for Open Science.
    15. Benjamin F Teresa, 2016. "Managing fictitious capital: The legal geography of investment and political struggle in rental housing in New York City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(3), pages 465-484, March.
    16. Gregory J. Robson, 2023. "How to Object to the Profit System (and How Not To)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(2), pages 205-219, November.
    17. Jelke R. Bosma, 2022. "Platformed professionalization: Labor, assets, and earning a livelihood through Airbnb," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 595-610, June.
    18. Pettit, Christopher & Liu, Edgar & Rennie, Ellie & Goldenfein, Jake & Glackin, Stephen & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Understanding the disruptive technology ecosystem in Australian urban and housing contexts: a roadmap," SocArXiv mdxyf, Center for Open Science.
    19. David Ciepley, 2019. "Can Corporations Be Held to the Public Interest, or Even to the Law?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1003-1018, February.
    20. Gernot Grabher & Erwin van Tuijl, 2020. "Uber-production: From global networks to digital platforms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 1005-1016, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:8:p:1732-1744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.