IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v58y2021i13p2782-2797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The representativeness of neighbourhood associations in Toronto and Vancouver

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron A Moore

    (University of Winnipeg, Canada)

  • R Michael McGregor

    (Ryerson University, Canada)

Abstract

Neighbourhood associations are major players in urban politics throughout North American cities and increasingly are becoming a political force in other parts of the world. However, while there is a rich and well-developed literature on the role played by neighbourhood associations in urban politics, few studies examine whether their membership reflects the socio-demographic composition and interests of the broader public. This paper addresses this gap in the literature using survey data from voters conducted during the Vancouver and Toronto 2018 municipal elections. We compare the responses of participants who identify as members of neighbourhood associations (or their equivalents) with those of the broader voting public. We find that members of neighbourhood associations in both cities are not representative of the broader population. They are more likely to be white, older and have higher education than the average voter. In addition, while the ideology of neighbourhood association members differs little from that of the broader public, their policy priorities are different from those of the majority of voters in both cities. Our findings suggest that neighbourhood associations fail in providing descriptive representation and may not offer substantive representation. These findings raise important questions about the role of neighbourhood associations in local governance. Our study also demonstrates the merit of using individual-level surveys to learn more about the composition and policy preferences of neighbourhood associations.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron A Moore & R Michael McGregor, 2021. "The representativeness of neighbourhood associations in Toronto and Vancouver," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2782-2797, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:13:p:2782-2797
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098020964439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098020964439
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098020964439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandra Flynn, 2019. "The Role of Business Improvement Areas and Neighbourhood Associations in the City of Toronto," IMFG Papers 45, University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.
    2. Peterson, Paul E., 1970. "Forms of Representation: Participation of the Poor in the Community Action Program," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 491-507, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brad Wright, 2015. "Voices of the Vulnerable: Community health centres and the promise and peril of consumer governance," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 57-71, January.
    2. Pettijohn Sarah L. & Boris Elizabeth T., 2018. "Testing Nonprofit State Culture: Its Impact on the Health of the Nonprofit Sector," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Zack Taylor & Alec Dobson, 2020. "Power and Purpose:Canadian Municipal Law in Transition," IMFG Papers 47, University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:13:p:2782-2797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.