IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v57y2020i5p1105-1117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fake friends: The illusionist revision of Western urbanology at the time of platform capitalism

Author

Listed:
  • Ugo Rossi

Abstract

It is generally assumed that the so-called populist explosion that has swept across liberal democracies since 2016 has led to a crisis of neoliberal reason in its original formulation. Owing to the close relationship between cities and neoliberalism, the crisis of neoliberal rationality has significantly impacted what is defined here ‘Western urbanology’. This definition brings together influential apologists of the urban age and its entrepreneurialist potential, starting with Richard Florida and Edward Glaeser. In recent times, these authors have started revisiting their conceptions and related policy proposals, in response to the growing sense of dissatisfaction with mainstream theorisations of economic development that has been associated with the populist explosion of 2016. However, this article shows how their revisions are minimal, and fundamentally illusory, as these authors have glossed over the very foundations of capitalist societies, drawing a veil over the issue of economic-value creation within contemporary platform urbanism. After having critically assessed the trajectory of Western urbanology, the article concludes by arguing that a substantial revision of the role of contemporary urbanism in economic development processes would require interrogating the creation and capture of economic value in today’s capitalist societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ugo Rossi, 2020. "Fake friends: The illusionist revision of Western urbanology at the time of platform capitalism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 1105-1117, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:5:p:1105-1117
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098018821581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098018821581
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098018821581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Austin & Edward Glaeser & Lawrence Summers, 2018. "Jobs for the Heartland: Place-Based Policies in 21st-Century America," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 49(1 (Spring), pages 151-255.
    2. Jamie Peck, 2016. "Economic Rationality Meets Celebrity Urbanology: Exploring Edward Glaeser's City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 1-30, January.
    3. Ugo Rossi, 2019. "The common-seekers: Capturing and reclaiming value in the platform metropolis," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1418-1433, December.
    4. Michael Storper & Allen J. Scott, 2009. "Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 147-167, March.
    5. Jamie Peck, 2005. "Struggling with the Creative Class," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 740-770, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noga Keidar, 2023. "CITIES AND THEIR GURUS: The Role of Superstar Consultants in Post‐political Urban Governance," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 279-298, March.
    2. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Hamid Beladi, 2022. "The Response of Creative Class Members to Regions Vying to Attract Them With Subsidies," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 45(5), pages 581-600, September.
    3. Aurélie LALANNE & Guillaume POUYANNE, 2012. "Ten years of metropolization in economics: a bibliometric approach (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-11, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    4. Niusha Esmaeilpoorarabi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda, 2016. "Place quality and urban competitiveness symbiosis? A position paper," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 4-21.
    5. Sami Moisio & Ugo Rossi, 2020. "The start-up state: Governing urbanised capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 532-552, May.
    6. Diego Barrado-Timón & Antonio Palacios & Carmen Hidalgo-Giralt, 2020. "Medium and Small Cities, Culture and the Economy of Culture. A Review of the Approach to the Case of Spain in Light of International Scientific Scholarship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-28, September.
    7. Philip Lawton, 2020. "Tracing the Provenance of Urbanist Ideals: A Critical Analysis of The Quito Papers," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 731-742, July.
    8. Sébastien Breau & Dieter F. Kogler & Kenyon C. Bolton, 2014. "On the Relationship between Innovation and Wage Inequality: New Evidence from Canadian Cities," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 90(4), pages 351-373, October.
    9. Kai Zhao & Yuesheng Zhang & Jinkai Zhao & Xiaojing Li, 2020. "Understanding Contributions of the Creative Class to Sustainable Economic Growth in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Nathaniel M Lewis, 2017. "Canaries in the mine? Gay community, consumption and aspiration in neoliberal Washington, DC," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(3), pages 695-712, February.
    11. Carl Grodach, 2013. "Cultural Economy Planning in Creative Cities: Discourse and Practice," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1747-1765, September.
    12. Kai Zhao & Yuesheng Zhang & Jinkai Zhao, 2020. "Exploring the Complexity of Location Choices of the Creative Class in Europe: Evidence from the EU Labor Force Survey 1995–2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Pierluigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2014. "Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2806-2821, October.
    14. Richard Florida & Charlotta Mellander & Patrick Adler, 2011. "The Creative Class Paradigm," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Åke E. Andersson & Charlotta Mellander (ed.), Handbook of Creative Cities, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Peter Sunley & Ron Martin & Ben Gardiner & Andy Pike, 2020. "In search of the skilled city: Skills and the occupational evolution of British cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 109-133, January.
    16. Vitálišová Katarína & Vaňová Anna & Šúrová Janka, 2020. "How to Attract and Retain Creative Class," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 245-266, June.
    17. Enda Murphy & Linda Fox-Rogers & Declan Redmond, 2015. "Location Decision Making of “Creative” Industries: The Media and Computer Game Sectors in Dublin, Ireland," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 97-113, March.
    18. Argentino Pessoa, 2016. "Rectracted: Smart specialization in the EU: RIS3 conditionality, innovation and cohesion," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(2), pages 439-439, June.
    19. Yasuyuki Motoyama & Sameeksha Desai, 2022. "Stickiness of entrepreneurs: an exploratory study of migration in two mid-sized US cities," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 2139-2155, April.
    20. Martin Perry, 2010. "Controversies in Local Economic Development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 25(7), pages 527-534, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:5:p:1105-1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.