IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v57y2020i4p883-893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On hostile design: Theoretical and empirical prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Rosenberger

Abstract

Instances of ‘hostile design’ appear across urban space, aimed at pushing particular behaviour – and, ultimately, particular people – out of public areas. But notions of hostile design and related concepts require theoretical clarification. Empirical study is also urgently needed on how such designs influence attitudes, behaviours and health, with implications for cities’ approaches to everything from homelessness to heatwave relief. This critical commentary reviews the main examples of hostile design, considers what, at minimum, must be addressed by theoretical accounts of this phenomenon, and identifies empirical research projects that are just waiting to be performed.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Rosenberger, 2020. "On hostile design: Theoretical and empirical prospects," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 883-893, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:4:p:883-893
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098019853778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019853778
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098019853778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naomi Smith & Peter Walters, 2018. "Desire lines and defensive architecture in modern urban environments," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 2980-2995, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William Woxnerud & Karim Najar & Ola Nylander, 2024. "The Human City: The Development of an Easy-to-Use Assessment Method Calibrated to Swedish Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Johan Wirdelöv, 2020. "The Trash Bin on Stage: On the Sociomaterial Roles of Street Furniture," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 121-131.
    3. Johan Wirdelöv, 2020. "The Trash Bin on Stage: On the Sociomaterial Roles of Street Furniture," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 121-131.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tauri Tuvikene & Wladimir Sgibnev & Wojciech Kȩbłowski & Jason Finch, 2023. "Public transport as public space: Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 2963-2978, November.
    2. Moogoor, Adithi & Močnik, Špela & Yuen, Belinda, 2022. "Neighbourhood environmental influences on older adults’ physical activities and social participation in Singapore: A photovoice study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    3. Loor, Ignacio & Evans, James, 2021. "Understanding the value and vulnerability of informal infrastructures: Footpaths in Quito," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Robin James Smith & Jonathan Ablitt & Joe Williams & Tom Hall, 2023. "The Coining of Convivial Public Space: Homelessness, Outreach Work, and Interaction Order," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 42-51.
    5. Morten Nielsen & Jason Sumich & Bjørn Enge Bertelsen, 2021. "Enclaving: Spatial detachment as an aesthetics of imagination in an urban sub-Saharan African context," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(5), pages 881-902, April.
    6. Manisha Anantharaman & Marlyne Sahakian & Czarina Saloma, 2023. "Spatialising degrowth in Southern cities: Everyday park-making for (un)commoning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(7), pages 1266-1284, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:4:p:883-893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.