IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v57y2020i16p3315-3330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultivating beneficiary citizenship in urban community gardens in Metro Manila

Author

Listed:
  • Kristian Saguin

Abstract

This paper introduces ‘beneficiary citizenship’ as a way to understand a form of urban citizenship that has emerged from shifts in state–citizen relations. Through the case of state-initiated urban community gardens in Metro Manila, it examines beneficiary citizenship as conditionally granting urban dwellers welfare, entitlements or recognition in the city in return for their transformation into good, responsible citizens. Beneficiary citizenship captures the dual forces of neoliberal technologies of government and alternative citizenship claims that are simultaneously present in various participatory and community-centred state projects. Case study gardens established in a resettlement housing project, in a poverty reduction programme and in a gated village in Metro Manila all seek to cultivate good citizen traits deemed worthy of being granted recognition in the city through a transformation of self and the community. Yet, beneficiaries in these projects also use their good gardener/citizen subjectivity to mobilise ends different from those intended by garden projects as technologies of government. Community gardens therefore become spaces where urban dwellers articulate citizenship by combining various strategies granted by their participation in the projects, exceeding attempts to order and contain urban life.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristian Saguin, 2020. "Cultivating beneficiary citizenship in urban community gardens in Metro Manila," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3315-3330, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:16:p:3315-3330
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098019897035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019897035
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098019897035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harvey Neo & C. Y. Chua, 2017. "Beyond Inclusion and Exclusion: Community Gardens as Spaces of Responsibility," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(3), pages 666-681, May.
    2. Maria Khristine Alvarez & Kenneth Cardenas, 2019. "Evicting Slums, ‘Building Back Better’: Resiliency Revanchism and Disaster Risk Management in Manila," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 227-249, March.
    3. Talja Blokland & Christine Hentschel & Andrej Holm & Henrik Lebuhn & Talia Margalit, 2015. "Urban Citizenship and Right to the City: The Fragmentation of Claims," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 655-665, July.
    4. Mark Purcell, 2003. "Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimagining the capitalist world order," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 564-590, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lisa Mullins & Sylvain Charlebois & Erica Finch & Janet Music, 2021. "Home Food Gardening in Canada in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oren Yiftachel, 2015. "Epilogue—from ‘Gray Space' to Equal ‘Metrozenship'? Reflections On Urban Citizenship," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 726-737, July.
    2. Morgana G Martins Krieger & Marlei Pozzebon & Lauro Gonzalez, 2021. "When social movements collaborate with the state towards the right to the city: Unveiling compromises and conflicts," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 1115-1139, August.
    3. Nir Cohen & Talia Margalit, 2015. "‘There are Really Two Cities Here’: Fragmented Urban Citizenship In Tel Aviv," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 666-686, July.
    4. Kira Kosnick, 2015. "A Clash Of Subcultures? Questioning Queer–Muslim Antagonisms in the Neoliberal City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 687-703, July.
    5. Esin Özdemir & Ayda Eraydin, 2017. "Fragmentation in Urban Movements: The Role of Urban Planning Processes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 727-748, September.
    6. Alex Afouxenidis, 2006. "Urban social movements in Southern European cities," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 287-293, December.
    7. Tanya Jakimow, 2020. "The Familiar Face of the State: Affect, Emotion and Citizen Entitlements in Dehradun, India," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 429-446, May.
    8. Francis Leo Collins & Wardlow Friesen, 2011. "Making the Most of Diversity? The Intercultural City Project and a Rescaled Version of Diversity in Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(14), pages 3067-3085, November.
    9. Kafui Attoh, 2017. "Public transportation and the idiocy of urban life," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 196-213, January.
    10. Ella Schmidt, 2006. "Sustainable Community for Sustainable Development," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 22(4), pages 379-400, December.
    11. Mark Purcell, 2006. "Urban Democracy and the Local Trap," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(11), pages 1921-1941, October.
    12. Jonathan Kingsley & Aisling Bailey & Nooshin Torabi & Pauline Zardo & Suzanne Mavoa & Tonia Gray & Danielle Tracey & Philip Pettitt & Nicholas Zajac & Emily Foenander, 2019. "A Systematic Review Protocol Investigating Community Gardening Impact Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    13. Sandra Breux & Jean‐Pierre Collin & Emmanuel Négrier, 2007. "Political Rescaling and Municipal Cultural Public Policies: A Comparison of France and Québec," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 128-145, March.
    14. Canoy, Nico A. & Robles, Augil Marie Q. & Roxas, Gilana Kim T., 2022. "Bodies-in-waiting as infrastructure: Assembling the Philippine Government's disciplinary quarantine response to COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    15. Fulong Wu, 2020. "Adding new narratives to the urban imagination: An introduction to ‘New directions of urban studies in China’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 459-472, February.
    16. Maedhbh Nic Lochlainn, 2024. "Book review: Neoliberal Urban Governance: Spaces, Culture and Discourses in Buenos Aires and Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(1), pages 188-191, January.
    17. Sergio Belda-Miquel & Jordi Peris Blanes & Alexandre Frediani, 2016. "Institutionalization and Depoliticization of the Right to the City: Changing Scenarios for Radical Social Movements," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 321-339, March.
    18. Marisol Garcia, 2006. "Citizenship Practices and Urban Governance in European Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(4), pages 745-765, April.
    19. Massingue, Suzanna Allen & Oviedo, Daniel, 2021. "Walkability and the Right to the city: A snapshot critique of pedestrian space in Maputo, Mozambique," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    20. Rasa Pranskuniene & Dalia Perkumiene, 2021. "Public Perceptions on City Landscaping during the Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease: The Case of Vilnius Pop-Up Beach, Lithuania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:16:p:3315-3330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.