IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i3p589-604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Friendship in a ‘Russian bar’ in London: An ethnography of a young Russian-speaking migrant community

Author

Listed:
  • Darya Malyutina

Abstract

Friendship is increasingly drawing attention as a concept used to explain the variety of ways in which migrants develop and sustain local and transnational relations. The advantage of this approach is its focus on social capital and those ‘sustaining and inspirational aspects’ of friendship that contribute to shaping different aspects of mobile individuals’ lives (Conradson and Latham, 2005, Friendship networks and transnationality in a world city: Antipodean migrants in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31(2): 301), instead of interpreting migrant sociality and urban conviviality in super-diverse conditions in terms of ethnic communities. At the same time, the focus on friendship suggests the contingent and nuanced character of these close social ties. Drawing upon an ethnographic case study of a group of young Russian-speaking migrants from post-Soviet countries and their social relationships in a London bar, this article explores the role of friendship in a migrant group located within a particular physical and social space. The place served as an important social junction, and its Russian-speaking network of bartenders and regulars was a source of friendly support and empowerment for its members, helping them confront feelings of marginality. However, close and intimate ties were also at times connected with power relations, reflecting social divisions and the reinforcement of ethnic/national stereotypes regarding those excluded from this social network. This article highlights that friendship encompasses a diverse and dynamic range of inclusionary and exclusionary practices, and discusses how migrant sociality can be negotiated through these practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Darya Malyutina, 2018. "Friendship in a ‘Russian bar’ in London: An ethnography of a young Russian-speaking migrant community," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(3), pages 589-604, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:3:p:589-604
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098016678780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098016678780
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098016678780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toshiko Tsujimoto, 2016. "Affective Friendship that Constructs Globally Spanning Transnationalism: The Onward Migration of Filipino Workers from South Korea to Canada," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 323-341, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boris Popivanov & Siyka Kovacheva, 2019. "Patterns of Social Integration Strategies: Mobilising ‘Strong’ and ‘Weak’ Ties of the New European Migrants," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 28-38.
    2. Fornaro, Paolo & Maliranta, Mika & Rouvinen, Petri, 2019. "Immigrant Innovators and Firm Performance," ETLA Working Papers 63, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nunzia Cristo & Cynthia Akwei, 2023. "‘Wish to Dream’ Fulfilment: the Motivations for Onward Migration," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 989-1016, September.
    2. Laavanya Kathiravelu & Tim Bunnell, 2018. "Introduction: Urban friendship networks: Affective negotiations and potentialities of care," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(3), pages 491-504, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:3:p:589-604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.