IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i12p2603-2617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cities for profit: Profit-driven gentrification in Seoul, South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Seon Young Lee

Abstract

Urban redevelopment in Korea has worked effectively as new-build, high-rise gentrification, since it is directly connected with social upgrading as a result of the improvement of the physical environment. This research attempts to explain the role of place entrepreneurs, especially property owners, in urban redevelopment and unravel key factors and their relationship to such redevelopment. The formation and nature of pro-gentrification coalitions is explored through a case study conducted in Yongsan, Seoul. Urban redevelopment processes have been primarily governed by the exchange value interests of property owners. Absentee landlords comprise the majority of property owners who have played the role of speculative investors. Even though owner-occupiers know they cannot afford to return after urban redevelopment, they do not strongly oppose urban redevelopment as long as they can share in urban redevelopment profit. To sum up, property owners play an important role as developers in the Korean urban redevelopment system and they accelerate gentrification.

Suggested Citation

  • Seon Young Lee, 2018. "Cities for profit: Profit-driven gentrification in Seoul, South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(12), pages 2603-2617, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:12:p:2603-2617
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098017727712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017727712
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098017727712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shin, Hyun Bang & Kim, Soo-Hyun, 2016. "The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60439, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. David Ley & Sin Yih Teo, 2014. "Gentrification in Hong Kong? Epistemology vs. Ontology," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1286-1303, July.
    3. Seong-Kyu Ha, 2010. "Housing Crises and Policy Transformations in South Korea," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 255-272.
    4. Tom Slater, 2006. "The Eviction of Critical Perspectives from Gentrification Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 737-757, December.
    5. Richard Ronald & John Doling, 2010. "Shifting East Asian Approaches to Home Ownership and the Housing Welfare Pillar," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 233-254.
    6. Ian Holliday, 2000. "Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 48(4), pages 706-723, September.
    7. Bae-Gyoon Park, 1998. "Where Do Tigers Sleep at Night? The State’s Role in Housing Policy in South Korea and Singapore," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 272-288, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyun Bang Shin & Loretta Lees & Ernesto López-Morales, 2016. "Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 455-470, February.
    2. Hyun Bang Shin & Soo-Hyun Kim, 2016. "The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 540-559, February.
    3. Hae Yeon Choo, 2021. "Speculative homemaking: Women’s labour, class mobility and the affect of homeownership in South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(1), pages 148-163, January.
    4. Bokyong Shin & Chaitawat Boonjubun, 2021. "Media and the Meanings of Land: A South Korean Case Study," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 381-425, March.
    5. Salleh, Alia, 2023. "Does the culture of property normalise eviction and demolition? The case of Kampung Sungai Baru, Kuala Lumpur," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118023, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Ray Forrest, 2016. "Commentary: Variegated gentrification?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 609-614, February.
    7. Cuz Potter & Danielle Labbé, 2021. "Gentrification or …? Injustice in large-scale residential projects in Hanoi," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2456-2472, September.
    8. Tsang, Churn & Hsu, Lin-Fang, 2022. "Beneath the appearance of state-led gentrification: The case of the Kwun Tong Town Centre redevelopment in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    9. Richard Ronald & Mee-Youn Jin, 2010. "Homeownership in South Korea: Examining Sector Underdevelopment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2367-2388, October.
    10. Narae Choi, 2016. "Metro Manila through the gentrification lens: Disparities in urban planning and displacement risks," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 577-592, February.
    11. Dai Whan An & Jae-Young Lee, 2023. "Implications of Renovated Buildings in Yeonnam-Dong, Seoul, an Area under Commercial Gentrification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Jinhee Park, 2019. "Neoliberalism Meets “Gangnam Style”: Vernacular Private Sector and Large Urban Developments in Seoul," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 62-72.
    13. Kon Kim, 2022. "Exclusion and Cooperation of the Urban Poor Outside the Institutional Framework of the Smart City: A Case of Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Adrienne La Grange & Frederik Pretorius, 2016. "State-led gentrification in Hong Kong," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 506-523, February.
    15. Paul Waley, 2016. "Speaking gentrification in the languages of the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 615-625, February.
    16. Bo Kyong Seo & Dayoon Kim, 2024. "THE HOUSING‐WELFARE REGIME AND THIRD‐SECTOR HOUSING IN HONG KONG AND SOUTH KOREA: A Historical Institutionalist Perspective," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 442-462, May.
    17. Huck-ju Kwon, 2007. "Transforming the developmental welfare states in East Asia," Working Papers 40, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    18. Josep M Campanera & Paul Higgins, 2011. "Quality of Life in Urban-Classified and Rural-Classified English Local Authority Areas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(3), pages 683-702, March.
    19. Marguerite van den Berg, 2018. "The discursive uses of Jane Jacobs for the genderfying city: Understanding the productions of space for post-Fordist gender notions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 751-766, March.
    20. Tim Butler, 2007. "Re‐urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 759-781, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:12:p:2603-2617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.