IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v53y2016i11p2330-2346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governmentalities in everyday practices: The dynamic of urban neighbourhood governance in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyuan Wan

Abstract

Urban neighbourhood has become a conspicuous arena of policy intervention in China, since the central government intensively promoted a Shequ system to strengthen its infrastructure power at neighbourhood level in the 1990s. As recent researches give increasing discussions to the roles different actors play and the division of responsibility within institutional procedures of Shequ, few empirical studies have been carried out to explore the everyday governing process and the stories happening at the receiving end of governance. This research uses a Foucauldian governmentality framework to critically analyse the Shequ institutions’ governing technologies in their everyday practices, and how these technologies succeed or fail to shape citizens’ conduct. Empirical evidences from the case study portray a hybridising scenario, in which the Shequ institutions embrace both the Maoist and Confucian discourses to cultivate active and responsible citizens. Nevertheless, residents’ divergent reactions to the government mobilisation suggest a process in which citizens develop their own ways to internalise or refuse the government interventions which aim to regulate their conduct. This paper concludes by suggesting that giving its materials of stories about the implementers and receivers of government discourses, neighbourhood governance can make important contributions to governmentality research in regards to the topics around the state’s power exercise at the grassroots society and citizens’ struggle around subjectivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyuan Wan, 2016. "Governmentalities in everyday practices: The dynamic of urban neighbourhood governance in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(11), pages 2330-2346, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:11:p:2330-2346
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015589884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015589884
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015589884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa M. Hoffman, 2014. "The Urban, Politics and Subject Formation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1576-1588, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Tang & Fengqin Zhou & Xueliang Feng & Yali Luo, 2018. "Collective Civic Petitions in Urban Neighborhoods: A Comparative Study between Two Different-Tier Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott Rodgers & Clive Barnett & Allan Cochrane, 2014. "Where is Urban Politics?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1551-1560, September.
    2. Habich-Sobiegalla, Sabrina & Rousseau, Jean-François, 2020. "Responsibility to choose: Governmentality in China’s participatory dam resettlement processes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Monika Streule, 2020. "Doing mobile ethnography: Grounded, situated and comparative," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 421-438, February.
    4. Mi Shih, 2017. "Rethinking displacement in peri-urban transformation in China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(2), pages 389-406, February.
    5. Janet Merkel, 2019. "‘Freelance isn’t free.’ Co-working as a critical urban practice to cope with informality in creative labour markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 526-547, February.
    6. Junxi Qian & Ning An, 2021. "URBAN THEORY BETWEEN POLITICAL ECONOMY AND EVERYDAY URBANISM: Desiring Machine and Power in a Saga of Urbanization," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 679-695, July.
    7. Sophie Gonick, 2016. "From Occupation to Recuperation: Property, Politics and Provincialization in Contemporary Madrid," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 833-848, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:11:p:2330-2346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.