IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v46y2009i12p2595-2615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Test of Character: Regulating Place-identity in Inner-city Melbourne

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Dovey

    (Department of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia, k.dovey@unimelb.edu.au)

  • Ian Woodcock

    (Department of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia, iswo@unimelb.edu.au)

  • Stephen Wood

    (School of Behavioural and Cognitive and Social Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia, stephen.wood@une.edu.au)

Abstract

During the 1990s, urban planning in Melbourne changed from prescriptive regulation to a place-based performance framework with a focus on existing or desired ‘urban character’. This paper is a case study of a contentious urban project in the inner-Melbourne suburb of Fitzroy: a highly valued place characterised as an irregular and transgressive mix of differences: between building types, functions, forms, heights and people. Contrasting conceptions, experiences and constructions of ‘character’ are explored from the viewpoints of residents, architect/developer and the state. To what degree does the regulation of ‘character’ open or close the city to creative innovation? Can it become camouflage for creative destruction? How to regulate for irregularity? The paper concludes with a discussion of theories of place (Massey vs Heidegger) and the prospects of concepts such as habitus (Bourdieu) and assemblage (Deleuze) for the interpretation of a progressive sense of place.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Dovey & Ian Woodcock & Stephen Wood, 2009. "A Test of Character: Regulating Place-identity in Inner-city Melbourne," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(12), pages 2595-2615, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:12:p:2595-2615
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098009344229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098009344229
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098009344229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:12:p:2595-2615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.