IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v42y2005i3p397-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

UK Health Action Zones: Political Accountability and Political Marketing-Perspectives from the South West

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Cole

    (LGC Elections Centre, Faculty of Social Science and Business, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK, Michael@doreytotnes.fsnet.co.uk)

  • Lesley Cotterill

    (Department of Sociology, University of Plymouth)

Abstract

This article evaluates the accountability of the strategic layer of Plymouth Health Action Zone (HAZ) and identifies conclusions with a wider application to partnership governance. The structures of Plymouth HAZ are assessed in the context of horizontal, vertical and downward models of accountability. The study finds fundamental weaknesses in the accountability regime. Vertical mechanisms are superficial and often inappropriate. The impact of horizontal accountability is marginalised through factors such as informal networks of dependency and a culture that discourages rigorous scrutiny. Downward accountability is addressed through the dissemination of information about achievements. In particular, the study highlights the difficulties of relying on local partners as the main mechanism of accountability. Plymouth HAZ is also evaluated in relation to political marketing and found to possess a sales-orientation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Cole & Lesley Cotterill, 2005. "UK Health Action Zones: Political Accountability and Political Marketing-Perspectives from the South West," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(3), pages 397-416, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:3:p:397-416
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980500034850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980500034850
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980500034850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:3:p:397-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.