Author
Listed:
- Robbie B. H. Goh
(Department of English Language and Literature, National University of Singapore, Block AS5, 7Arts Link, Kent Ridge, Singapore 117570, ellgohbh@nus.edu.sg)
Abstract
Studies of Singapore public housing have tended to emphasise the ways in which urban planning and housing policies have contributed to rapid infrastructural development in the 1970s and 1980s while maintaining racial harmony and providing affordable housing to the majority of the population. In the 1990s, a series of `upgrading' exercises in many Singapore Housing and Development Board (HDB) estates have signalled a change in the status and function of public housing within Singapore's project to position itself as a global city. These transformations in the built environment are part of a larger process of social transformation not merely in terms of housing policy, but also in terms of issues of governance, class and social mobility, community and value systems. The centrality of public housing in Singapore's built environment, together with the sensitivity of its relationship to social indicators of upward mobility, make it a key indicator of the issues facing Singapore as it attempts to position itself as a global city. In particular, the move from a 'modern' to 'post-modern' architectural style signals the government's attempt at the same time to mark Singapore's arrival as a global city, to anticipate and manage social and economic divides and to construct a possible space for increasing public input and expression.
Suggested Citation
Robbie B. H. Goh, 2001.
"Ideologies of `Upgrading' in Singapore Public Housing: Post-modern Style, Globalisation and Class Construction in the Built Environment,"
Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(9), pages 1589-1604, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:9:p:1589-1604
DOI: 10.1080/00420980120076821
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:9:p:1589-1604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.