IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v35y1998i9p1519-1540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Indicators to Assess the Potential for Urban Regeneration: Improvements Using the 1991 Census of Population Samples of Anonymised Records

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Gardiner

    (School of Urban and Regional Studies and the Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Pond Street, Sheffield, S1 1WB, England, UK, C.Gardiner@shu.ac.uk.)

Abstract

This paper explores possibilities for improvements in the quality of indicators to assess the potential for urban regeneration. A new source of data—the 1991 Census of Population Samples of Anonymised Records—is investigated. Refinements and improvements in the quality and targeting of indicators for the Single Regeneration Budget and other regeneration initiatives are recom mended. It is concluded that the 2 per cent Sample of Anonymised Records represents an invaluable resource supplementing the Index of Local Conditions and other databases as a source of information for regeneration based policy assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Gardiner, 1998. "Developing Indicators to Assess the Potential for Urban Regeneration: Improvements Using the 1991 Census of Population Samples of Anonymised Records," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 1519-1540, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:35:y:1998:i:9:p:1519-1540
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098984268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098984268
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098984268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M G Bradford & B T Robson & R Tye, 1995. "Constructing an Urban Deprivation Index: A Way of Meeting the Need for Flexibility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(4), pages 519-533, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen Witten & Daniel Exeter & Adrian Field, 2003. "The Quality of Urban Environments: Mapping Variation in Access to Community Resources," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 161-177, January.
    2. C Gardiner, 1998. "Improvements, by Using a New Set of Data, to the English Standard Spending Assessments: The 1991 Census of Population Samples of Anonymised Records," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 16(5), pages 543-558, October.
    3. Ian Hodge & Jessica Dunn & Sarah Monk & Caroline Kiddle, 2000. "An Exploration of ‘Bundles' as Indicators of Rural Disadvantage," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(10), pages 1869-1887, October.
    4. Peter Kitchen, 2001. "An Approach for Measuring Urban Deprivation Change: The Example of East Montréal and the Montréal Urban Community, 1986 – 96," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(11), pages 1901-1921, November.
    5. C Connolly & M Chisholm, 1999. "The Use of Indicators for Targeting Public Expenditure: The Index of Local Deprivation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(4), pages 463-482, August.
    6. Allan Brimicombe, 2000. "Constructing and Evaluating Contextual Indices Using GIS: A Case of Primary School Performance Tables," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(11), pages 1909-1933, November.
    7. A Sloggett & H Joshi, 1998. "Indicators of Deprivation in People and Places: Longitudinal Perspectives," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(6), pages 1055-1076, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:35:y:1998:i:9:p:1519-1540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.