IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v35y1998i10p1889-1911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polarisation, Public Housing and Racial Minorities in US Cities

Author

Listed:
  • William H. Carter

    (Wharton Real Estate Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 190104-6330, USA, carter@ssc.sas.upenn.edu)

  • Michael H. Schill

    (New York University School of Law, Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New York University, 40 Washington Square South, Room 411, New York, NY 10012-1099, USA, schillm@turing.law.nyu.edu)

  • Susan M. Wachter

    (Wharton Real Estate Department, University of Pennsylvania, Lauder-Fischer Hall, 256 South 37th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6330, USA, wachter@finance.wharton.upenn.edu)

Abstract

Cities in the US have become home to an increasing concentration of poor households, disproportionately composed of racial and ethnic minorities. In the US, poor and minority populations are overrepresented in public housing, mostly located in central cities. Racial and ethnic minorities in American public housing are, for the most part, composed of native-born households whereas in Europe they are more likely to be foreign-born. After a description of this concentration of poor and minority populations in public housing, we examine the effect of public housing on neighbourhood poverty rates in central cities. We construct a longitudinal database (1950-90) for four large cities-Boston, Cleveland, Detroit and Philadelphia—and examine the relationship between the location of public housing and changes in neighbourhood poverty rates. We find that in each city, one or more of the variables relating to the existence of public housing is significantly related to increases in neighbourhood poverty rates in succeeding decades.

Suggested Citation

  • William H. Carter & Michael H. Schill & Susan M. Wachter, 1998. "Polarisation, Public Housing and Racial Minorities in US Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(10), pages 1889-1911, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:35:y:1998:i:10:p:1889-1911
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098984204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098984204
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098984204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(5), pages 416-416.
    2. Hugh O. Nourse, 1963. "The Effect of Public Housing on Property Values in St. Louis," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 39(4), pages 433-441.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uslaner, Eric, 2011. "Contact, Diversity, and Segregation," SULCIS Working Papers 2011:5, Stockholm University, Linnaeus Center for Integration Studies - SULCIS.
    2. George Galster & Jackie Cutsinger & Up Lim, 2007. "Are Neighbourhoods Self-stabilising? Exploring Endogenous Dynamics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(1), pages 167-185, January.
    3. Claudio O. Delang & Ho Cheuk Lung, 2010. "Public Housing and Poverty Concentration in Urban Neighbourhoods: The Case of Hong Kong in the 1990s," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(7), pages 1391-1413, June.
    4. Alfonso Gallego-Valadés & Francisco Ródenas-Rigla & Jorge Garcés-Ferrer, 2021. "Spatial Distribution of Public Housing and Urban Socio-Spatial Inequalities: An Exploratory Analysis of the Valencia Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    5. R. Alan Walks, 2001. "The Social Ecology of the Post-Fordist/Global City? Economic Restructuring and Socio-spatial Polarisation in the Toronto Urban Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(3), pages 407-447, March.
    6. Young-Jae Kim & Ayoung Woo, 2016. "What’s the Score? Walkable Environments and Subsidized Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Linlin Zhang & Xiaobin Zhang & Huiling Huang & Liang Zhang & Huan Li, 2022. "Spatial Accessibility of Multiple Facilities for Affordable Housing Neighborhoods in Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Feng Deng, 2018. "A theoretical framework of the governance institutions of low-income housing in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(9), pages 1967-1982, July.
    9. Yingqi Guo & Shu-Sen Chang & Feng Sha & Paul S F Yip, 2018. "Poverty concentration in an affluent city: Geographic variation and correlates of neighborhood poverty rates in Hong Kong," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Katharine L. Shester & Samuel K. Allen & Christopher Handy, 2019. "Concrete measures: the rise of public housing and changes in young single motherhood in the U.S," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 369-418, April.
    11. Dan Ye & Jingxiang Zhang & Guoliang Xu, 2017. "Peripherization of Indemnificatory Housing Community under Land-Centered Urban Transformation: The Case of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roland N. McKean, 1973. "An Outsider Looks at Urban Economics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 19-37, February.
    2. Salih Ozgur SARICA, 2014. "Regional Economic Growth. Socio-Economic Disparities among Counties," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 3(4), pages 25-36, December.
    3. Sandy Fréret & Denis Maguain, 2017. "The effects of agglomeration on tax competition: evidence from a two-regime spatial panel model on French data," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(6), pages 1100-1140, December.
    4. Hilber, Christian A.L., 2010. "New housing supply and the dilution of social capital," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 419-437, May.
    5. Natalie Brady, 2002. "Striking a Balance: Centralised and Decentralised Decisions in Government," Treasury Working Paper Series 02/15, New Zealand Treasury.
    6. Patrick Bayer & Fernando Ferreira & Robert McMillan, 2007. "A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(4), pages 588-638, August.
    7. Tidiane Ly, 2018. "Sub-metropolitan tax competition with household and capital mobility," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(5), pages 1129-1169, October.
    8. Jean Gabszewicz & Ornella Tarola & Skerdilajda Zanaj, 2016. "Migration, wages and income taxes," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 23(3), pages 434-453, June.
    9. Zodrow, George R, 2003. "Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in the European Union," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 651-671, November.
    10. repec:rri:wpaper:200803 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Tomaz Dentinho & Vanda Serpa & Paulo Silveira & Joana Goncalves, 2006. "Land Use Change and Socio-Economic Evaluation in São Jorge Island (Between 15th and 20th Century)," ERSA conference papers ersa06p91, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Padovano, Fabio & Petrarca, Ilaria, 2014. "Are the responsibility and yardstick competition hypotheses mutually consistent?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 459-477.
    13. Teuta Balliu & Loreta Bebi, 2015. "Taxation and Government Expenditures in the Center of the Albanian Policy Debate," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, ejes_v1_i.
    14. Deller, Steven C. & Hinds, David G. & Hinman, Donald L., 2001. "Local Public Services In Wisconsin: Alternatives For Municipalities With A Focus On Privatization," Staff Papers 12658, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    15. Gerring, John & Thacker, Strom C. & Lu, Yuan & Huang, Wei, 2015. "Does Diversity Impair Human Development? A Multi-Level Test of the Diversity Debit Hypothesis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 166-188.
    16. Alberto Alesina & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2011. "Segregation and the Quality of Government in a Cross Section of Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(5), pages 1872-1911, August.
    17. Stephen Billings & Thomas Thibodeau, 2011. "Intrametropolitan Decentralization: Is Government Structure Capitalized in Residential Property Values?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 416-450, May.
    18. Matthieu Leprince & Sonia Paty & Emmanuelle Reulier, 2005. "Choix d'imposition et interactions spatiales entre collectivités locales. Un test sur les départements français," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 71(1), pages 67-93.
    19. Nishitateno, Shuhei & Burke, Paul J., 2021. "Willingness to pay for clean air: Evidence from diesel vehicle registration restrictions in Japan," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Teresa Garcia-Milà & Therese J. McGuire, 2001. "Tax incentives and the city," Economics Working Papers 631, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Dec 2001.
    21. Allen C. Goodman & Miron Stano, 2000. "Hmos and Health Externalities: A Local Public Good Perspective," Public Finance Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 247-269, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:35:y:1998:i:10:p:1889-1911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.