IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/soueco/v23y2022i2p228-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening and Monitoring in Informal Credit Markets: Evidence from Rural Punjab

Author

Listed:
  • Indervir Singh

Abstract

The present article examines the screening and monitoring strategies used by lenders to solve the problem of imperfect information in the rural informal credit market. The study uses data from a primary survey conducted in Punjab, India. The survey focuses on informal lending between commission agents and farmers. Data were collected from 120 randomly selected commission agents from four blocks. Each of the blocks represents a different development level. The results show that commission agents invested significant time and resources for screening and monitoring the farmers. The screening and monitoring were found to be more stringent in areas that were underdeveloped and had higher default risk. Commission agents could shift a significant share of the screening cost to the borrowers, thereby increasing their self-enforcement range. The study argues that high screening cost hurts small farmers. The regression results found a significant reduction in the default rate and the unrecovered loan due to screening strategies. JEL Classification: D81, E26, Q14

Suggested Citation

  • Indervir Singh, 2022. "Screening and Monitoring in Informal Credit Markets: Evidence from Rural Punjab," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 23(2), pages 228-251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:soueco:v:23:y:2022:i:2:p:228-251
    DOI: 10.1177/13915614221107844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13915614221107844
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13915614221107844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Adverse selection; farm credit; imperfect information; informal credit markets; monitoring; moral hazard; screening;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • E26 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Informal Economy; Underground Economy
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:soueco:v:23:y:2022:i:2:p:228-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ips.lk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.