IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v53y2024i4p1873-1904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Survey Mode Design and Questionnaire Length on Measurement Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru Cernat
  • Joseph Sakshaug
  • Pablo Christmann
  • Tobias Gummer

Abstract

Mixed-mode surveys are popular as they can save costs and maintain (or improve) response rates relative to single-mode surveys. Nevertheless, it is not yet clear how design decisions like survey mode or questionnaire length impact measurement quality. In this study, we compare measurement quality in an experiment of three distinct survey designs implemented in the German sample of the European Values Study: a single-mode face-to-face design, a mixed-mode mail/web design, and a shorter (matrix) questionnaire in the mixed-mode design. We compare measurement quality in different ways, including differences in distributions across several data quality indicators as well as equivalence testing over 140 items in 25 attitudinal scales. We find similar data quality across the survey designs, although the mixed-mode survey shows more item nonresponse compared to the single-mode survey. Using equivalence testing we find that most scales achieve metric equivalence and, to a lesser extent, scalar equivalence across the designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru Cernat & Joseph Sakshaug & Pablo Christmann & Tobias Gummer, 2024. "The Impact of Survey Mode Design and Questionnaire Length on Measurement Quality," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 53(4), pages 1873-1904, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:53:y:2024:i:4:p:1873-1904
    DOI: 10.1177/00491241221140139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00491241221140139
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00491241221140139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:53:y:2024:i:4:p:1873-1904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.