IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v52y2023i3p1519-1555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response Behavior and Quality of Survey Data: Comparing Elderly Respondents in Institutions and Private Households

Author

Listed:
  • Jan-Lucas Schanze

Abstract

An increasing age of respondents and cognitive impairment are usual suspects for increasing difficulties in survey interviews and a decreasing data quality. This is why survey researchers tend to label residents in retirement and nursing homes as hard-to-interview and exclude them from most social surveys. In this article, I examine to what extent this label is justified and whether quality of data collected among residents in institutions for the elderly really differs from data collected within private households. For this purpose, I analyze the response behavior and quality indicators in three waves of Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. To control for confounding variables, I use propensity score matching to identify respondents in private households who share similar characteristics with institutionalized residents. My results confirm that most indicators of response behavior and data quality are worse in institutions compared to private households. However, when controlling for sociodemographic and health-related variables, differences get very small. These results suggest the importance of health for the data quality irrespective of the housing situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan-Lucas Schanze, 2023. "Response Behavior and Quality of Survey Data: Comparing Elderly Respondents in Institutions and Private Households," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 52(3), pages 1519-1555, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:52:y:2023:i:3:p:1519-1555
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124121995534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124121995534
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124121995534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:52:y:2023:i:3:p:1519-1555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.