IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v32y2003i1p64-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversity in Everyday Research Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Erin Leahey
  • Barbara Entwisle
  • Peter Einaudi

Abstract

How should social science researchers deal with data inaccuracies? This article uses Web-based survey data collected from faculty members in three social science disciplines to document variation in views about data editing. Through an analysis of qualitative responses to a hypothetical vignette, the authors demonstrate that a wide range of opinion surrounds the “proper†use of data. Reactions are to some extent contingent on discipline and experience with different types of data and data collection methods. They also depend on characteristics of the data-editing situation—for example, whether the problem is with an independent or dependent variable. Even taking these social and situational factors into account, however, there is still substantial diversity in vignette responses. Normative standards that pervade other aspects of the research process have not yet emerged for data editing.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin Leahey & Barbara Entwisle & Peter Einaudi, 2003. "Diversity in Everyday Research Practice," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 32(1), pages 64-89, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:32:y:2003:i:1:p:64-89
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124103253461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124103253461
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124103253461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:32:y:2003:i:1:p:64-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.