IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v31y2002i2p131-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rashomon Effect

Author

Listed:
  • WENDY D. ROTH

    (Harvard University wroth@wjh.harvard.edu)

  • JAL D. MEHTA

    (Harvard University jmehta@fas.harvard.edu)

Abstract

Positivist and interpretivist analytical approaches are frequently believed to be incompatible as research strategies and ways of understanding the world. This article argues that not only may versions of positivism and interpretivism be combined in the analysis of contested events, but this combination can further the goals of both approaches by contributing information that may have been missed by adopting only one perspective. The authors illustrate this using two case studies of lethal school shootings near Paducah, Kentucky, and Jonesboro, Arkansas, and introduce methodological strategies to manage potential biases that may lead to contradictory testimony. However, these same contradictions act as distinct data points from the interpretivist perspective, offering insight into the cultural understandings of a community. The authors develop new forms of triangulation that are tailored to these research goals and illustrate how, just as positivist analysis may be used to aid interpretivism, an interpretive understanding of a community may be necessary to develop causal theories of contested events such as school shootings.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy D. Roth & Jal D. Mehta, 2002. "The Rashomon Effect," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 31(2), pages 131-173, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:31:y:2002:i:2:p:131-173
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124102031002002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124102031002002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124102031002002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, Gary & Keohane, Robert O. & Verba, Sidney, 1995. "The Importance of Research Design in Political Science," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(2), pages 475-481, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rockers, Peter C. & Røttingen, John-Arne & Shemilt, Ian & Tugwell, Peter & Bärnighausen, Till, 2015. "Inclusion of quasi-experimental studies in systematic reviews of health systems research," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(4), pages 511-521.
    2. Armingeon, Klaus, 2006. "Kleinstaaten in Weltmärkten: drei Ergänzungen der Katzenstein-These," TranState Working Papers 47, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    3. Minasyan, Anna & Zenker, Juliane & Klasen, Stephan & Vollmer, Sebastian, 2019. "Educational gender gaps and economic growth: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 199-217.
    4. James Johnson, 2003. "Conceptual Problems as Obstacles to Progress in Political Science," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 15(1), pages 87-115, January.
    5. Codini, Anna Paola & Abbate, Tindara & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2023. "Business Model Innovation and exaptation: A new way of innovating in SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:31:y:2002:i:2:p:131-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.