IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v16y1988i4p427-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the Extent of Racially Polarized Voting in Multicandidate Contests

Author

Listed:
  • BERNARD GROFMAN

    (School of Social Sciences University of California, Irvine)

  • MICHAEL MIGALSKI

    (School of Social Sciences University of California, Irvine)

Abstract

We extend the standard ecological regression methodology for analysis of racial bloc voting in single-member districts in which there is one seat to be filled to cover multimember districts without a numbered-place system. In such multimember districts voters may vote for up to k candidates and not all voters need to cast the same number of votes. These complications render the usual single-equation OLS technique inappropriate. The methodology we propose involves a two-step estimating procedure. The variable that is our principal concern, the proportion of white voters who vote for the black (or other minority) candidate, has its value determined by combining information from each of our two separate estimating equations. Thus we cannot directly obtain a confidence limit for our estimated value of this variable from either of the two equations alone. We derive a value of the standard error of our estimate of this variable by combining formula for the variance of the quotients and sums of two variables of known variance and covariance. We verify that our results are robust by comparing our estimates with those generated by the “seemingly unrelated regression†(SURE) model that is designed to cope with correlated errors in regressions that share in the same independent variables. The methodology we develop has an important application in voting rights litigation challenging the constitutionality of the multimember districts and at-large elections, which are the most common form of election mechanism in U.S. cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Grofman & Michael Migalski, 1988. "Estimating the Extent of Racially Polarized Voting in Multicandidate Contests," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 16(4), pages 427-453, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:16:y:1988:i:4:p:427-453
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124188016004001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124188016004001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124188016004001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cho, Wendy K. & Judge, George G., 2003. "Some Empirical Evidence on the Impact of Measurement Errors in Making Ecological Inferences," CUDARE Working Papers 25080, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:16:y:1988:i:4:p:427-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.