IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v11y1982i1p33-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obtaining Respondent Cooperation in Family Panel Studies

Author

Listed:
  • ARLAND THORNTON

    (University of Michigan)

  • DEBORAH S. FREEDMAN

    (University of Michigan)

  • DONALD CAMBURN

    (University of Michigan)

Abstract

Problems of maintaining respondent rapport in surveys are exacerbated when respondents are asked to participate repeatedly over time or when several members of a family are interviewed. This article details the techniques used to maintain respondent rapport in a longitudinal study involving six interviews over eighteen years, which, after being expanded to include a second family member, still included 85% of the original respondents. The article describes techniques designed to assist and motivate the interviewers to do an effective job and those utilized to make the interviewing process pleasant and rewarding for the respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Arland Thornton & Deborah S. Freedman & Donald Camburn, 1982. "Obtaining Respondent Cooperation in Family Panel Studies," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 11(1), pages 33-51, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:11:y:1982:i:1:p:33-51
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124182011001002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124182011001002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124182011001002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ribisl, Kurt M. & Walton, Maureen A. & Mowbray, Carol T. & Luke, Douglas A. & Davidson, William S. & Bootsmiller, Bonnie J., 1996. "Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: Review and recommendations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Wright, James D. & Allen, Tupper Lampton & Devine, Joel A., 1995. "Tracking non-traditional populations in longitudinal studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 267-277.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:11:y:1982:i:1:p:33-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.