IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v5y2000i3p71-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Class Situation of Information Specialists: A Case Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Clare Lewin
  • Myron Orleans

Abstract

This paper examined the paradoxical class situation of information specialists in the post-industrial society as both professionals and employees. We described and analyzed the ‘technocratic’ authority wielded by them and their mode of consciousness. We assessed whether these workers functioned as the vanguard of a new style of democratized work or buttressed the position of managerial authority. We used qualitative methods to study the social conduct and meaning systems of fourteen computer specialists, including programmers, analysts, and project leaders employed in a large insurance company. The data was analyzed using a critical phenomenological perspective derived from the work of authors such as Berger, Braverman, Burawoy, Foucault, and Marcuse. We found that the subjects experienced a class situation that was somewhat more empowered than the industrial or corporate models, but did not differ substantially from that of the production workers in industrial society. Their power, prestige, privilege and status essentially camouflaged the subjects’ compliance to hierarchical authority. The subjects exhibited awareness of their power but essentially directed their energies toward task attainment and individual mobility. Lacking an orientation toward structure change, the information specialists did not appear to fit the notion of a vanguard group. From this research we foresee some possibilities of changes within organizational authority as information specialists confront management with their expertise, but we anticipate that the institutions of social domination will prevail.

Suggested Citation

  • Clare Lewin & Myron Orleans, 2000. "The Class Situation of Information Specialists: A Case Analysis," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 5(3), pages 71-81, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:5:y:2000:i:3:p:71-81
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.517
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.517?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul DiMaggio & Eszter Hargittai & Coral Celeste & Steven Shafer, 2003. "From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use: A Literature Review and Agenda for Research on Digital Inequality," Working Papers 29, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:5:y:2000:i:3:p:71-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.