IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v4y1999i3p122-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Posts-) Modernism and Structuralism: Affinities and Theoretical Innovations

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Peters

Abstract

This paper argues that “poststructuralism†can be distinguished from “structuralism†in terms of an important set of theoretical and historical differences that can be most easily understood by recognizing the difference between their theoretical objects of study: poststructuralism takes as it theoretical object “structuralism†, whereas postmodernism takes as its theoretical object “modernism†. Each movement is an attempt to supersede in various ways that which went before. The two movements can be distinguished by a peculiar set of theoretical concerns most clearly seen in their respective historical genealogies. Poststructuralism ought to be seen as a specific philosophical response - strongly motivated by the work of Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger - against the social scientific pretensions of structuralism.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Peters, 1999. "(Posts-) Modernism and Structuralism: Affinities and Theoretical Innovations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 4(3), pages 122-138, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:4:y:1999:i:3:p:122-138
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.342
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.342?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:4:y:1999:i:3:p:122-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.