IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v4y1999i1p107-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Police Investigation of the Murder of Stephen Lawrence: A ‘Mundane Sociological Analysis’

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Holdaway

Abstract

‘Race’ is a litmus test for understanding relationships within institutions. Conflicts between ethnic majorities and minorities (and other minorities too) have a capacity to not only bring particular features of racialised relations to view but to also lay bare generic, institutional relationships. In this paper, I argue that the Lawrence Inquiry report directs us to mundane features of policing. Crucially we need to understand the complex ways in which the occupational culture of policing constructs and sustains particular forms of racialised relations. There are two key features of this culture. One is a tendency to use stereotypical thinking generally and in relation to ethnic minorities in particular. The other is to neglect the pertinence of race to rouitne police work. The presence and absence of ‘race’ is woven into the routines of the occupational culture. Police action can, as the Lawrence Inquiry report suggests be ‘unwitting’. To argue the existence of ‘unwitting’ action, however, it is necessary to demonstrate that police officers could have acted differently. The murder of Stephen Lawrence and the police investigation into it have to be placed within this context if an adequate sociological analysis is to be undertaken.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Holdaway, 1999. "Understanding the Police Investigation of the Murder of Stephen Lawrence: A ‘Mundane Sociological Analysis’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 4(1), pages 107-114, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:4:y:1999:i:1:p:107-114
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.234
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:4:y:1999:i:1:p:107-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.