IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v3y1998i1p76-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The British Crime Survey Sample: A response to Elliott and Ellingworth

Author

Listed:
  • P. Lynn

Abstract

In this journal, Elliott and Ellingworth (1997)reported their attempts to assess the impact of certain sources of survey error on the British Crime Survey. This article attempts to correct some flaws in their article, to place their results in a wider context, and to provide some further - arguably more robust - estimates of the impact of non-response bias.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Lynn, 1998. "The British Crime Survey Sample: A response to Elliott and Ellingworth," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 3(1), pages 76-81, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:3:y:1998:i:1:p:76-81
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.152
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Elliott & D. Ellingworth, 1997. "Assessing the Representativeness of the 1992 British Crime Survey: The Impact of Sampling Error and Response Biases," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 2(4), pages 55-70, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:3:y:1998:i:1:p:76-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.