IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v26y2021i1p44-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Long 2015 in Germany: Activists’ Pro-Refugee Frames and Media Counter Frames

Author

Listed:
  • Simin Fadaee

Abstract

In September 2015, Germany opened its doors to refugees arriving via the Balkan Route. The influx of refugees generated support and solidarity among individuals, civil society groups and political and cultural institutions and various social movements. In this article, I analyse the frames proffered by two pro-refugee groups based in Berlin and contrast them with the propagated media counter frames which ultimately dominated the public discourse. I demonstrate that despite an explicit intention and commitment to foster support for refugees, the pro-refugee groups’ choice of frames could have been more strategic if they would have not neglected media counter frames. I argue that although the literature’s focus on dynamics of movement and media frames has provided useful tools for analysing the relation between the two, engaging with media counter frames is as equally important, especially if we are concerned with questions around strategy and the outcomes of social mobilizations. Empirically, this article provides a unique insight into micro politics of pro-refugee mobilizations in Europe. Theoretically, it contributes to a better understanding of media and movement frames by emphasizing the significance of dynamic engagement with media counter frames for creation of progressive political alliances with the wider public.

Suggested Citation

  • Simin Fadaee, 2021. "The Long 2015 in Germany: Activists’ Pro-Refugee Frames and Media Counter Frames," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(1), pages 44-59, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:44-59
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780420907922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780420907922
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780420907922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick G. Coy & Lynne M. Woehrle & Gregory M. Maney, 2008. "A Typology of Oppositional Knowledge: Democracy and the U.S. Peace Movement," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(4), pages 82-96, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Garcia Bochenek, 2023. "The Persistent, Pernicious Use of Pushbacks against Children and Adults in Search of Safety," Laws, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-30, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julie Schweitzer & Tamara L Mix, 2022. "‘It Is a Tradition in the Nuclear Industry . . . Secrecy’: Political Opportunity Structures and Nuclear Knowledge Production in France," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(2), pages 504-524, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:44-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.