IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v26y2021i1p3-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Methodological Potential of Scrapbooking: Theory, Application, and Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Ros Walling-Wefelmeyer

Abstract

The methodological possibilities of scrapbooking have hitherto been largely neglected in social science research. This article provides much needed theoretical and empirical insights into its potential, positing it as a practical and conceptual process of saving, sharing, and making sense(s) of the everyday and ephemeral. Scrapbooking highlights both the contingency and partiality of the scraps themselves and its own performance of giving them form. Research into how women experience and interpret ‘men’s intrusions’ over the course of 1 week put these ideas into practice. The study used both physical and digital scrapbooks, for which the social media platform Tumblr was employed. An evaluation of scrapbooking’s methodological potential produced three characteristic ‘tensions’: between freedom and constraint, between the raw and the processed, and between the therapeutic and the intrusive. These three tensions necessitate further exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Ros Walling-Wefelmeyer, 2021. "The Methodological Potential of Scrapbooking: Theory, Application, and Evaluation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(1), pages 3-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:3-26
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780420909128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780420909128
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780420909128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:3-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.