IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v19y2014i4p122-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections on Positionality from a Russian Woman Interviewing Russian-Speaking Women in London

Author

Listed:
  • Darya Malyutina

Abstract

This paper explores the implications of shared femininity in a qualitative study of friendship networks amongst Russian-speaking migrants in London by a Russian researcher. Drawing upon feminist literature on the complexities of women interviewing women, I outline the reflexive approach to positionality informing power relations and establishment of trust in the relationship between the researcher and the researched. The examples of interviewing a friend and two friendly strangers demonstrate the ways of negotiating mutual positions in the interaction. Shared gender is regarded as partially, but not universally, promoting rapport, taking into account the intersectionality of multiple differences between women. Considering the researcher's positionality has been presented in this paper as a means of making similarities and differences between participants useful for the critical interpretation of the work, and using its relevant aspects for building a positive, open, and more equal interaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Darya Malyutina, 2014. "Reflections on Positionality from a Russian Woman Interviewing Russian-Speaking Women in London," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(4), pages 122-134, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:19:y:2014:i:4:p:122-134
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3475
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Millen, 1997. "Some Methodological and Epistemological Issues Raised by Doing Feminist Research on Non-Feminist Women," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 2(3), pages 114-128, September.
    2. Maria Pérez-Y-Pérez & Tony Stanley, 2011. "Ethnographic Intimacy: Thinking through the Ethics of Social Research in Sex Worlds," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(2), pages 39-48, June.
    3. Aarti Ratna, 2013. "Intersectional Plays of Identity: The Experiences of British Asian Female Footballers," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(1), pages 108-117, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra Ridgway & Kate Lowe, 2022. "Looking Within: A Call for Greater Reflexivity in Expatriate Research," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(4), pages 1077-1093, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kathryn Haynes, 2008. "Moving the gender agenda or stirring chicken's entrails?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(4), pages 539-555, May.
    2. Çela Eriada, 2015. "Am I an Active Citizen? Women’s Narratives of Citizenship Practices in Albania," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(73), pages 109-129, August.
    3. Gayle Letherby, 2002. "‘Claims and Disclaimers: Knowledge, Reflexivity and Representation in Feminist Research’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 6(4), pages 81-93, February.
    4. Sam Pryke, 2004. "‘Some of Our People can be the Most Difficult’. Reflections on Difficult Interviews," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:19:y:2014:i:4:p:122-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.