IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v19y2014i3p104-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Alternative Ethics? Justice and Care as Guiding Principles for Qualitative Research

Author

Listed:
  • Martyn Hammersley
  • Anna Traianou

Abstract

The dominant conception of social research ethics is centred on deontological and consequentialist principles. In place of this, some qualitative researchers have proposed a very different approach. This appeals to a range of commitments that transform the goal of research as well as framing how it is pursued. This new ethics demands a participatory form of inquiry, one in which the relationship between researchers and researched is equalized. In this paper we examine this alternative approach, focusing in particular on two of the principles that are central to it: justice and care. We argue that there are some significant defects and dangers associated with this new conception of research ethics.

Suggested Citation

  • Martyn Hammersley & Anna Traianou, 2014. "An Alternative Ethics? Justice and Care as Guiding Principles for Qualitative Research," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 104-117, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:19:y:2014:i:3:p:104-117
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3466
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Berghs, M. & Dyson, S.M. & Gabba, A. & Nyandemo, S.E. & Roberts, G. & Deen, G., 2020. "“You have to find a caring man, like your father!” gendering sickle cell and refashioning women's moral boundaries in Sierra Leone," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:19:y:2014:i:3:p:104-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.