IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v18y2013i2p131-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restricting the Public in Public Space: The London 2012 Olympic Games, Hyper-Securitization and Marginalized Youth

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Kennelly
  • Paul Watt

Abstract

In contrast to Olympic organizers’ claims about the London 2012 Games as a celebration for all, we recount the experiences of low-income and marginally housed young people as experiencing exclusion from the benefits of the Games being held in their neighbourhood. Drawing on qualitative methods with young people living in the ethnically diverse and economically deprived Olympic host borough of Newham, we focus on public space and its limitations in the context of the 2012 Games. The article discusses the sense conveyed by young people of their neighbourhood being made beautiful for visitors, but of themselves being overly policed and subject to Olympic-related dispersal orders. We conclude by querying for whom is public space made available during the Olympic Games, suggesting that the benefactors are not economically marginalized young people living in the shadow of the Games.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Kennelly & Paul Watt, 2013. "Restricting the Public in Public Space: The London 2012 Olympic Games, Hyper-Securitization and Marginalized Youth," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(2), pages 131-136, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:18:y:2013:i:2:p:131-136
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Graham, 2012. "Olympics 2012 security," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 446-451, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melissa Wilson & Bob Catterall, 2015. "City 's holistic and cumulative project (1996-2016): (1) Then and now: 'It all comes together in Los Angeles?'," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 131-142, February.
    2. Keith Spiller, 2016. "Experiences of accessing CCTV data: The urban topologies of subject access requests," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(13), pages 2885-2900, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:18:y:2013:i:2:p:131-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.