IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v18y2013i2p118-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Bring on the Dancing Horses!’: Ambivalence and Class Obsession within British Media Reports of the Dressage at London 2012

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Fletcher
  • Katherine Dashper

Abstract

Due to historical relationships with the military, royalty, landed gentry and upper-class society, equestrian sport faces regular accusations of being elitist and exclusionary. Through qualitative textual analysis of British press reporting of dressage events at the London 2012 Olympic Games we argue that despite British dominance of the sport, these historical associations with the upper classes, privilege and elitism were foregrounded in many media reports; trivialising and at times mocking dressage. We identify three key themes related to the ways in which media reports framed dressage and its participants in heavily class-laden terms. Faced with their ignorance of the sport, the majority of articles analysed resorted to class-based stereotypes that trivialised, satirised and devalued this seemingly elitist and incomprehensible sport. The success of Team GB in dressage meant that media reports were never wholly critical and elements of the hysteria and pride surrounding the Games led to a highly ambivalent response to dressage that reflects the ‘vague, confused, contradictory [and] ignorant’ ( Cannadine 1998 : x) attitudes to social class that characterise British society at the current time.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Fletcher & Katherine Dashper, 2013. "‘Bring on the Dancing Horses!’: Ambivalence and Class Obsession within British Media Reports of the Dressage at London 2012," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(2), pages 118-125, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:18:y:2013:i:2:p:118-125
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3040
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:18:y:2013:i:2:p:118-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.