IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v18y2013i2p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Having Your Say: The Social Organisation of Online News Commentary

Author

Listed:
  • Allison Cavanagh
  • Alex Dennis

Abstract

This paper describes an analysis of poster and recommender activities in an online news forum. Quantitative analyses of patterns of posting and recommending suggest that claims about ‘horizontality’ and ‘online community’ are oversimplifications, as there is strong evidence to suggest that the actual workings of networked discussion communities incorporate a wide range of competing and mutually-contradictory orientations, activities and strategies. A qualitative analysis of particular posters’ rhetorical strategies provides evidence for the argument that an orientation to conventions (in particular using a dialogical mode of address) is more important than actual opinion or semantic content in gaining popularity. The implications of these findings, and some suggestions for how this work might be developed, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Allison Cavanagh & Alex Dennis, 2013. "Having Your Say: The Social Organisation of Online News Commentary," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(2), pages 1-10, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:18:y:2013:i:2:p:1-10
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.2919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2919
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.2919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:18:y:2013:i:2:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.