IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v17y2012i4p103-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Relations among Indian Couples in the UK and India: Ideals of Equality and Realities of Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Twamley

Abstract

This paper explores young heterosexual Indian Gujaratis’ ideals and experiences of intimate relationships in the UK and India, focusing particularly on gender relations. Men and women in both contexts had similar aspirations of intimacy, but women were likely to be more in favour of egalitarian values. What this meant was interpreted differently in India and the UK. In neither setting, however, was gender equality fully realised in the lives of the participants due to both structural and normative constraints. Despite this gap between ideals and experiences, participants portrayed their relationships as broadly equal and conjugal. It appears that the heavy emphasis on love and intimacy is making it difficult for women to negotiate a more egalitarian relationship with their partner, since any ‘flaw’ in the relationship potentially brings into question its loving foundations. In this way, women tend to ignore or justify the gendered roles and inequalities apparent in their relationships and paint a picture of blissful marital equality despite evidence to the contrary.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Twamley, 2012. "Gender Relations among Indian Couples in the UK and India: Ideals of Equality and Realities of Inequality," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(4), pages 103-113, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:17:y:2012:i:4:p:103-113
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.2756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2756
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.2756?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katherine Twamley & Charlotte Faircloth, 2015. "Introduction to Special Section Gender, Intimacy, Equality: (Un)comfortable Bedfellows?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(4), pages 119-122, November.
    2. Punita Chowbey, 2017. "What is Food Without Love? The Micro-politics of Food Practices Among South Asians in Britain, India, and Pakistan," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(3), pages 165-185, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:17:y:2012:i:4:p:103-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.