IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v17y2012i4p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logics of Structuring the Elder Care Arrangements over Time and Their Foundations

Author

Listed:
  • José De São José

Abstract

On the basis of family carers’ perspectives, this article sets out to understand the logics of structuring care arrangements for older people over time, as well as to capture the roots of these logics. The data analyzed was gathered through qualitative research carried out in the Lisbon area. We found that elder care arrangements have been structured over time according to a logic designated by ‘family primacy’, in which family care has precedence over other modes of care provision. However, this logic is put into practice in different forms, associated with different social classes: ‘restrictively’ by family carers belonging to middle classes (they want to have a restricted involvement in care provision) and ‘extensively’ by family carers belonging to working classes (they are willing to have an extensive involvement in care provision). The results also reveal that the logic of ‘family primacy’ is rooted not only on ‘familistic’ values and norms but also on the negative impression family carers have of the quality of other modes of care provision. Lastly, it was also found that some elders agree with the logic of ‘family primacy’, whilst others idealize a slightly different logic (‘conditional family primacy’) which is compatible with the logic of ‘family primacy’, and still others who idealize a very different logic (‘family exclusivity’) which is not compatible with the logic of ‘family primacy’ and consequently could produce serious tensions between the elders and their family carers. It is believed that questioning the ‘hierarchical compensatory model’ proposed by Cantor is one of the contributions of this article.

Suggested Citation

  • José De São José, 2012. "Logics of Structuring the Elder Care Arrangements over Time and Their Foundations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:17:y:2012:i:4:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.2734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.2734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miriam Glucksmann & Dawn Lyon, 2006. "Configurations of Care Work: Paid and Unpaid Elder Care in Italy and the Netherlands," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(2), pages 25-39, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julie MacLeavy, 2021. "Care work, gender inequality and technological advancement in the age of COVID‐19," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 138-154, January.
    2. Elisa Barbiano di Belgiojoso & Livia Elisa Ortensi, 2015. "Female Labour Segregation in the Domestic Services in Italy," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1121-1139, November.
    3. Kathryn Wheeler & Miriam Glucksmann, 2013. "Economies of Recycling, ‘Consumption Work’ and Divisions of Labour in Sweden and England," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(1), pages 114-127, February.
    4. Maria Zadoroznyj & Cecilia Benoit & Sarah Berry, 2012. "Motherhood, Medicine & Markets: The Changing Cultural Politics of Postnatal Care Provision," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(3), pages 134-144, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:17:y:2012:i:4:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.