IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v71y2025i2p426-436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Old age from the perspective of LGBTQ+ and heterosexual young: A comparative study

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Elçin BoyacıoÄŸlu
  • Hatice Selin Irmak
  • Åžeyma Bozkurt Uzan

Abstract

Background: In today’s world, the challenges and achievements of LGBTQ+’s throughout their lives are increasingly gaining attention. However, the specific needs of LGBTQ+’s in the aging process and potential challenges they might face during this period are often overlooked. Aims: This study aims to demonstrate LGBTQ+’s and heterosexual young’s perspectives on old age. Method: This descriptive, cross-sectional comparative study collected data from 230 LGBTQ+ and 201 heterosexual individuals. Data were collected using a digital survey comprising an 8-item Personal Information Form and a 17-item Questionnaire for Opinions Regarding Old Age. Results: Compared to others, LGBTQ+’s consider old age to be a more problematic period. In this study, it was determined that LGBTQ+’s perceive old age as a bigger problem compared to those in the heterosexual group. It was determined that the possible difficulties that LGBTQ+’s expect to face in old age are mostly related to basic needs such as the need for care and lack of social support. In the heterosexual group, concerns about age-related physical changes such as loss of youth were observed more frequently. Conclusion: It is recommended that studies to be conducted and services to be offered in this area should be of nature that would ensure safety of LGBTQ+’s, protect their basic humanitarian rights and respond to their needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Elçin BoyacıoÄŸlu & Hatice Selin Irmak & Åžeyma Bozkurt Uzan, 2025. "Old age from the perspective of LGBTQ+ and heterosexual young: A comparative study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 71(2), pages 426-436, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:2:p:426-436
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640241294202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640241294202
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640241294202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:71:y:2025:i:2:p:426-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.