Author
Listed:
- Rowan Diamond
- Felicity Waite
- Anne-Marie Boylan
- Alice Hicks
- Thomas Kabir
- David Shiers
- Daniel Freeman
Abstract
Background: The need to increase exercise and decrease sedentary behaviour in people diagnosed with psychosis is well-recognised. Aims: We set out to explore caregivers’ perspectives on what supports and prevents physical activity, and how to use carers’ support most effectively. Method: Fourteen caregivers of people diagnosed with psychosis were interviewed. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, in collaboration with caregivers. Results: Four themes were developed, the first flagging the importance of physical activity, then the others calling for action: (a) Physical inactivity matters: carers are keen to support efforts to increase physical activity in their family or friends because of the enormous impact physical inactivity has on patients, and consequently on carers themselves, such as social isolation and reduction in their own activity. (b) Tell us: without being well-informed about how to help, carers can feel like they are powerless to stop a ‘slow suicide’ or ‘decline’ in patients. (c) Listen to us: through knowing their family and friends well, carers are able to identify important changes in patients and identify successful motivators for them, but these insights can feel uninvited. (d) Ask us: being invited to support activity as a partner in a patients’ care is desirable but having offers of help rejected can “demotivate the motivator.†Conclusions: Caregivers described strong motivation to help patients to be more physically active but can feel that their support is overlooked and under-used by services. Clinical recommendations for carer involvement in physical activity interventions are offered.
Suggested Citation
Rowan Diamond & Felicity Waite & Anne-Marie Boylan & Alice Hicks & Thomas Kabir & David Shiers & Daniel Freeman, 2024.
"Supporting movement and physical activity in people with psychosis: A qualitative exploration of the carer perspective,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(8), pages 1525-1532, December.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:8:p:1525-1532
DOI: 10.1177/00207640241277166
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:8:p:1525-1532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.